posted on January 8, 2003 07:34:08 AM new
Boy that is an attractive offer.
Deal deadly blows to the Yankee dog and you can join us - and live in a hut and eat grass in a desperate attempt to fill your belly.
Who needs those fancy duds and TV's and cars?
<quote>
In all things in life, Helen, each person is responsibile for their own actions. Can't use the excuse....'they made me do it'. There are always other ways to react to anything anyone does. Wife beaters choose to blame their lack of self control on their victim.
<end quote>
Why don't you start a thread on wife beating - which appears to be more up your alley. You may learn about the consequences when the husband or the wife fails to be responsible and loses control. You will find that even though you may identify the responsible spouse, the other one may lie dead or injured.
I am not going to discuss wife beating with you and your crazy notion of it's relation to nuclear war.
posted on January 8, 2003 07:52:30 AM newI am not going to discuss wife beating with you and your crazy notion of it's relation to nuclear war. LOL
I used it as an example, you responded [rather than just ignoring my statement - your choice ] and now you're not going to discuss it. I didn't want to discuss it, I used it as an example to explain how I see it the same way as you stating NK is doing what they've done, because Bush did xxxxxx. NK is the one violating the UN agreement, no matter the reasons of the 'why' for their [NKs] actions. Bush didn't/wasn't threatening nuclear action.
posted on January 8, 2003 11:45:43 AM new
My question is what exactly has that North Korean dictator done that was so bad?
What?
That he broke his Clinton-wrought agreement? That makes him a Bad Guy on the Axis-of-Evil?
What's so unusual about that?
Our own President breaks any international agreement that He doesn't care to honor! He broke the SALT I and II treaties. He broke our agreement to sign the Kyoto Accord once it had been ratified by the Senate, which it had been. So we have no High Road to go around pointing fingers at other heads of state that are acting the very same way. The only reason that this is getting any attention is that we're on the short end of the stick this time.
] and now you're not going to discuss it. 
I didn't want to discuss it, I used it as an example to explain how I see it the same way as you stating NK is doing what they've done, because Bush did xxxxxx. NK is the one violating the UN agreement, no matter the reasons of the 'why' for their [NKs] actions. Bush didn't/wasn't threatening nuclear action.