posted on June 10, 2004 12:16:42 PM new
bunnicula, I agree partly with you. If something is vulgar or obscene, yes they'll pull it, and/or suspend. But they don't read every single post in every single thread, someone or more had to point out the specific post and/or thread where it was 'vulgar' or obscene or whatever.
If they did read everything posted,there still would be moderators here.
posted on June 10, 2004 12:22:02 PM new
Welcome back, twelvepole. Sorry to hear some tattle-tail turned you in. Getting to be more and more like living in France, where they don't like free speech.
-------------------
helenjw says: No article or comment that skylite has posted here is obscene or objectionable. Figures you'd see it that way.
posted on June 10, 2004 01:27:44 PM new
Naw....NTS...you're way too young to be twelve's mom.
You're going to be one of those grandmas where everyone compliments you on what a beautiful child YOU have there...[rather than grandchild]. And you'll beam with joy each time it happens. I'm thrilled for you.
If it wasn't monitored, why did someone from Vendio step in to post?
BTW - Welcome back, twelve! Believe it or not I've missed your snide remarks! And I look forward to all the opportunities I'll have to disagree with you. LOL!
posted on June 10, 2004 05:27:05 PM new
What I mean is that if they monitored these, then someone from Vendio would come in, say in the picture thread, and say it was inappropriate and they were either locking it, or they were zapping it. Instead, it was just gone. Or posters are just gone, like twelve was.
Then, that's what they should do. Instead of suspending right off the bat, why not warn. Unless they do and twelve was warned more than once. I don't understand just suspending someone without a warning first. But then, eBay does the same thing. They zap auctions on the word of someone else.
LOL! 