posted on October 28, 2004 10:11:42 PM newI don't find humor in people bending over and soap either so I guess we just don't share each others humor and it will have to stay like that.
So when I posted my story which was meant as humor you disagree, which is fine by me, but when you post you're humor I am supposed to see it that way and agree. Why the double standard here?
Here, i'll reiterate it from my 2nd post on page 2 for you, Kiara, of what you said that was false; who was going to show us pictures of all the insurgents and terrorists in Iraq As I said before that I never said that I was going to show you any pictures, this was false.
posted on October 28, 2004 10:30:24 PM new
No, Helen I am just wondering why Kiara puts words in my mouth and tries to put thoughts in my head about things that I am supposedly going to do for her in a discussion, i.e. who was going to show us pictures of all the insurgents and terrorists in Iraq I never said that I was going to show her any pictures
There I have posted it thrice for you, Kiara, do you see it now??
posted on October 28, 2004 10:32:48 PM new
Sigh..... the "Vendio Show and Tell" story was just humor...... it was not a real authentic story.
Sorry if some took it so much to heart.
*************************************
I posted the above on the last page, Yellowstone. NO, you did NOT say you were going to show pictures because I was telling a "story". Gone With The Wind was a story too, not all stories are true stories. Some stories are fiction. What part of that don't you understand?
Was the rest of my story so true to you that you took it ALL to heart? I can't explain it clearer than I have. I'm sorry you can't see it any other way.
posted on October 28, 2004 10:41:26 PM new
Kiara
I had allready told you in a previous thread that I wasn't going to allow you to put words in my mouth, do you remember that?? You responded with an appology, acknowledging that I was right. So when I saw the falsehood that you posted as if I had said that about posting pictures, I took it that you were ignoring your previous appology and acknowledgement to me.
ed to add; I'll find that previous thread for you tomorrow as I am not logged on to the AOL account that I have it bookmarked on now.
ed to add; In your story I noticed that every reference that you made about everyone else was based on true and correct sets of circumstances about past things that were said in previous posts. Mine was the only one that you included a falsehood.
[ edited by yellowstone on Oct 28, 2004 10:46 PM ]
[ edited by yellowstone on Oct 28, 2004 10:53 PM ]
posted on October 28, 2004 10:50:51 PM new
I have apologized several times and I explained that it was not posted as a true story, that it was meant as humor. If you can't understand that simple concept there isn't anything else I can say.
But I do see that you do not understand my humor and I will remember to never mention your name on this board again if I can help it.
posted on October 28, 2004 11:07:02 PM new
Fine by me but understand something about all of this. I have never told any lies about you, I have never said that you have said something or anything that you didn't say and I have never disrespected you in any way. To the contrary, I have allways gone out of my way to show you respect and I have allways considered you to be a friend.
posted on October 29, 2004 09:27:26 AM new
Kiara
If I were to go by you're way of thinking I should be able to do the following without offending you;
I can call you a lier and not offend you as long as I do it in a humourous way,
I can put words in you're mouth and say that you said things that you didn't say and not offend you as long as I do it in a humourous way,
I can disrespect you and not offend you as long as I do it in a humourous way.
Lets take this a step further, I can call you names like biitch, assshole, dumbasss or how about if I were to call you a C'nt, it should be ok as long as I do it in a humourous way, it shouldn't offend you.
My point is that we have never engaged in that sort of talk with each other in the past but it seems that you now want to start. Are you going to continue to pretend to not see my point or are you a big enough person to admit you are wrong??
posted on October 29, 2004 10:01:22 AM new
Edited to preface my post by saying I'm talking in a quiet and calm manner because Linda_k has stuck her big nose into this one and is spewing her version of crap below.
I was telling a fictional story and posted that the person (whose name is the same as a National Park) was showing pictures and telling stories about Iraq.
He followed up with this comment which was ALSO fictional.
And then there's Kiara who has secret sexual fantasies about President Bush, she wonders what it is that is stuffed into the crotch of his flight suit. She just can't tear her eyes away from the bulge in his crotch. Shall I go on??
His objection is:
In your story I noticed that every reference that you made about everyone else was based on true and correct sets of circumstances about past things that were said in previous posts. Mine was the only one that you included a falsehood.
I did not realize that EAG had ever truly fled in embarrassment, that Stonecold and Parklane were truly twins, that Bear truly could only grunt or that Linda_k had ever truly become so hysterical she actually fell to the floor laughing.
ALL of these must have been 'true and correct sets of circumstances' before I arrived at this board.
I can say I honestly did not know that it was the truth about any of them so YES, it set him apart from the others in my fictional story if it was indeed the truth about them so it was WRONG of me to only post that about him.
Now he says:
Lets take this a step further, I can call you names like biitch, assshole, dumbasss or how about if I were to call you a C'nt, it should be ok as long as I do it in a humourous way, it shouldn't offend you.
I don't get the reasoning in this one because in the fictional story I never called him dirty names.
I have explained and apologized numerous times already and I have no idea what else he expects of me.
posted on October 29, 2004 10:17:53 AM newor are you a big enough person to admit you are wrong??
I've always enjoyed your humor, yellowstone, but this takes the cake.
kiara is never wrong....and she's told me often to 'cram it up my as$'....and always with smilies. She claims she never gets angry or upset...and has often 'put words in my mouth'.
And you think she might be a big enough person to admit she EVER does anything inappropriate or wrong? LOL LOL LOL
sorry....I'll stay out of your issue with kiara....but from what I've experienced with here....this IS the real kiara. Not the same professional I knew on the EO side of these boards.
posted on October 29, 2004 10:24:49 AM new
ANOTHER LIE from linda ?!?!?! How can they pile up so high?
She posts,"or are you a big enough person to admit you are wrong??
I've always enjoyed your humor, yellowstone, but this takes the cake.
kiara is never wrong....and she's told me often to 'cram it up my as$'....and always with smilies. She claims she never gets angry or upset...and has often 'put words in my mouth'.
And you think she might be a big enough person to admit she EVER does anything inappropriate or wrong? LOL LOL LOL
sorry....I'll stay out of your issue with kiara....but from what I've experienced with here....this IS the real kiara. Not the same professional I knew on the EO side of these boards. "
posted on October 29, 2004 10:26:01 AM new
Linda_k, you've stuck your nose in it a couple of times already so it's a bit late now.
You also have a reading comprehension problem because I've apologized several times and admitted I was wrong.
I want to add thanks to Helen and Kraft for their support as I never said it to them last evening.
Not the same professional I knew on the EO side of these boards.
Like I'm supposed to be 'professional' over here all the time also? She had no problem whatsoever with my posts on the RT UNTIL she found out I didn't glorify and worship Bush and fall for the lies about the war. It was at that very moment that she turned her vile on me and never gave up.
posted on October 29, 2004 11:19:19 AM new
Okay then kiara....since my nose is already in it...
I responded because I know EXACTLY what yellowstone is saying. You've done it to me over and over and over again. Yet you are never willing to admit it. Well...I take that back. When you and I first started conversing....I called you on your sarcasim to me. You did admit it then and seemed proud of it. That was the beginning of my personal loss of respect for you....not as you claim...because of your anti-Bush statements. But I guess since you continue to try and place the blame on him, rather than take responsibility for your own words and statements to me...that's your way of remaining totally innocent - another projection you try to get others to believe.
It appears to me that if you continuing stating what you always do...[paraphrasing here]
"I'm saying this is a calm manner"....then throwing the insult out...along with a smilie face...then you think others aren't noticing your snide comments to them.
Wake up and smell the coffee....it's easily seen by all. You're fooling no one.
Now you've put words in the mouth of yellowstone...like you have done repeatedly with others who even appear to lean right. Always a game...always denying it when you're called on it.
You could have made this real simple and rather than go immediately into your denial mode you could have quickly make yellowstone feel better by apologizing and saying that wasn't your intent to put words in his mouth.
posted on October 29, 2004 11:26:33 AM new
OK, now, Kiara, when you're right and linduh's wrong(as usual) now you're not right you're "sarcastic".
I'm sure you've all noticed how when linduh is wrong on a TOPIC she immediately attacks the poster!
They are speaking in a "tone" she doesn't like(she can hear through the screen I guess). Or they're sarcastic, or she can't answer because SHE doesn't respect the poster, or they call names, or "everybody knows they're a liar", ...or, or, or ,or......she always has an excuse for being wrong and it's never HER fault.
posted on October 29, 2004 11:34:48 AM new
I will preface my post by saying I'm talking in a quiet and calm manner because Linda_k hears voices in her head and relates them to the feelings of others.
Linda_k, I have enough respect for the other poster that I will let him say how he feels. If he has given you approval to speak for him at least he should let me know.
I have no bad feelings about him and have always enjoyed his posts. Just because of this incident it's not going to change how I truly feel about him, no matter how much you try to contribute to a rift between us, okay?
While I'm here, I resent that you choose to read the "tones" in my voice like you've once again done above and you have done to others here.
In real life I am a quiet and calm person and I've been especially chosen for certain business dealings because of that quality. It may not come across here on this board but that is the way I am, whether you choose to believe so or not because of the voices you hear in your head.
And one more thing, don't tell me how I should have done things and expect me to be like you. I can think for myself and take responsibility for my own actions without your input, thank you.
posted on October 29, 2004 11:59:46 AM new
Kiara, I think this is a bunch of balony. The right is so hyper-uptight worrying about the election that they're not behaving very well. I guess while in the home stretch, you're not allowed to joke or be sarcastic with them. Well, you're not suppose to anytime, but this week will be the roughest.
And as far as trying to "fool" people Linda, how so?
posted on October 29, 2004 12:20:50 PM newYou could have made this real simple and rather than go immediately into your denial mode you could have quickly make yellowstone feel better by apologizing and saying that wasn't your intent to put words in his mouth.
I read this over and Kiara has apologized about half a dozen times already. How many times can she explain this over and over. I understood it was not a real story so I fail to see where she put words in his mouth.
As far as slinging goes I see it from both sides during this election so there are no innocent "virgins" here.
Now, back to my gun cleaning.
posted on October 29, 2004 12:24:17 PM new
kiara - No, my bet would be that yellowstone would have preferred me to stay out of it. It was at your implied invitation that I said how I can see that you've done the same thing to me...and others.
It sounds to me like yellowstone would like to remain friends, or at least on a friendly basis with you. And all it would take is for you to say something along the line of "I'm sorry, that was not my intent"....to have corrected this misunderstanding the two of you are experiencing.
And KD is you can't see how kiara 'remaining calm and speaking in a oh so very nice manner' and even adding a smilie face while telling me to 'cram it up my a$$' repeatedly ...would offend anyone...then there's nothing I could EVER say to explain it to you. You've never done that to others, KD, and I seriously doubt you miss kiara doing so.
posted on October 29, 2004 12:32:58 PM new
trai - It's that kiara has refused that she's done what yellowstone believes she has. Not that she doesn't keep apologizing and then continues with why she didn't do it.
And I'd bet a lot of citizens are doing the same thing you're doing with your gun.
---------------------
kiara says: In real life I am a quiet and calm person and I've been especially chosen for certain business dealings because of that quality. This board IS real life kiara. It's a part of what we do in our daily lives. Some do come on a play games.... But I doubt any of your clients/customers would feel one bit differently than I do had you ever told them to 'cram it up their as$'. Even if you put a little smilie face with your message to them.
Hope that points out the difference in how YOU act and treat others....treating them differently than you have some of us here.
It may not come across here on this board but that is the way I am, whether you choose to believe so or not because of the voices you hear in your head.
See...good example right there. I have no voices in my head....I have your posted nasty comments to me....in print.
posted on October 29, 2004 12:34:55 PM newI want to add thanks to Helen and Kraft for their support as I never said it to them last evening.
So if Linda does the same for me, that is give me support in my argument, you call it "sticking her nose in" I don't get that one. Incedentally, I do appreciate the support and understanding that Linda has given me in all of this and I highly value her input.
A little note for you to consider, Kiara for whatever it is worth; In this thread alone we may not be in agreement and I don't expect us to allways agree, however, if you will note that I have refrained from using any harsh language wheather in a serious manner or joking manner. My scenarios in my last post about what I perceive should now be allowed, by your way of thinking and I might add by your logic were hypothetical scenarios and should not be taken as actual insults directed at you.
As far as you appologising several times, that was in past discussions not related to this one. I sincerely accept your past appologies but now you have gone and done the same thing again, in this thread, that has put you in a position to either appologise or ignore what you said to me.
posted on October 29, 2004 12:44:29 PM new
Linda, everyone has a unique way of expressing themselves. I've slung it at Twelve repeatedly and called him names (he knows I'm being truthfully sarcastic) after being called the c-word and having him pick out my coffin. Big deal. Why then if Kiara tries the same thing on Yellowstone or whoever, she's a bad girl? She's apologized which wasn't warranted, imo, and explained herself, even though she was JOKING around. Kiara, me, Helen, Cheryl, Prof, Yeager, etc.,... we're ALL sarcastic people that that understand this type of humour in each other. If the right doesn't like our jokes or doesn't get them, then they should ignore us all. We enjoy the laughs and you guys could too if you'd all quit being so uptight.
I think that it's remarkable how yellowstone and linda are so alike as far as their sense of humor is concerned. Yellowstone why don't we just agree to exclude you from any humorous play in the future? No one intended to hurt your feelings in this case or wants to hurt your feelings in the future. I realized a few days ago that you are difficult to gauge -- when you became so upset when I agreed with you. So, I decided to avoid dealing with you because you are simply so sensitive, tedious and unpredictable.
posted on October 29, 2004 01:04:02 PM new
Yes, in RL on certain occasions I have told someone to 'cram it up their azz', so to speak and I've truly said it with a smile on my face. Believe it or not, I am still on good terms with some and others don't deserve my time of day. Since Linda_k has never had my identical life experience in the business world or my private life, she may not understand that it's possible to do so.
She seems to have a problem because I don't act the way she wants me to and I have to keep reminding her that I choose to be an individual and I don't want to be like everyone else.
I'm not going to C&P all my apologies from this page and previous ones as it's obvious that a couple of others can already see them. How many times am I expected to kiss azz over a silly joke? I'm outa this one.
posted on October 29, 2004 01:43:21 PM new
yellowstone - Good, I'm relieved to know my interference didn't bother you. It's just that I could sooo, personally, identity with the actions that were bothering you.
--------
KD - If the right doesn't like our jokes or doesn't get them, then they should ignore us all.
Oh? Well if someone continued to follow you around stating lies about you, your thoughts, beliefs or feelings....you might feel differently. If someone who has continued to make rude and uncalled for statements to you, that you didn't want to 'play' with you might feel differently. Because we can't walk in anothers shoes, we can't speak for how they feel being the brunt of a joke...or continued negative statements....or continued harassment. If it doesn't bother them...they won't speak out...if it does they will...and rightfully so.
I don't for one minute see bunni, fenix, trai, profe, and other lefties going 'round' having their 'fun' at the expense of others by making false statements. I see they're able to disagree or post their opinion without all the nastiness/lies/insinuations.
But imo, what we're talking about here...is putting words into peoples mouths. IMPLYING they've said things that have NEVER said. It's a game and everybody here knows who does it all the time...and some of the time...and those who don't do it at all.
kiara, imo, is following in the footsteps of crowfarm when she continues to to imply people said things or feel things they don't. She uses her 'crystal ball' to know their thoughts. And when she gets 'called' on it...asked nicely to stop doing it, as was the case here then she reverts back to her 'little miss innocent' game and of course it's the other persons fault for taking offense to having words put in their mouth. Words THEY NEVER SAID. Acting in a way they never treated her.
We enjoy the laughs and you guys could too if you'd all quit being so uptight.
Not true at all. It's just that those comments are only thrown at those who they oppose politically....and when we laugh at something we find funny...we get chastised by the same lefties here that find 'slams' to righties hysterically funny. It's a one way street.
posted on October 29, 2004 01:50:52 PM newBecause we can't walk in anothers shoes, we can't speak for how they feel being the brunt of a joke...or continued negative statements....or continued harassment. If it doesn't bother them...they won't speak out...if it does they will...and rightfully so
Linda finally gets....however she forgot one thing...in the process there is some collateral damage (meaning the innocent sometimes get hurt as well).
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on October 29, 2004 01:54:20 PM new
Linda, I understand what you're saying about being followed around and being called names. I personally think it's childish but we both know that it says more about the name caller than the person being attacked. Like when I call Twelve an alcoholic. Although I'm joking, a statement like that is my baggage, not his. Knowing that, don't you think this is a bit overblown?
LOL 