posted on November 18, 2004 09:50:55 AM
Mine was a statement, and certainly not a 'whine'. I am not the whiner here.
There you go again with the name calling
I consider that another wimpy whine from you, several in the space of a couple of days. I will repeat, I have not called anyone names here.
And where I choose to live has nothing to do with yesterday's discussion about Al Qeada or this discussion about Condi. It's none of your business at all and doesn't affect your life at all. I see no reason why you should be so focused on it. So get a life.
posted on November 18, 2004 10:30:35 AM "The uninformed.There you go again with the name calling and cute phrases when you have nothing intelligent to say. Again, you're no crow or maggie. You just can't cut it."
Etexbill,
Kiara, one of the most well informed posters on this board can "cut it" without name calling and the silly type of harrassment that you carry on. At least, she hasn't incited you to suggest that she come to your farm where you shoot crows. Remember the time that you told us that "everyone" in Texas carries a gun...that you have a small ranch where Crows eat vermin, roadkill and pecans. You went on to say that you shoot crows on sight. Then, you said, "CROWfarm, come on down for a visit."
Finally you said "adios all" but unfortunately, only for a little while.
ubb ed.
[ edited by Helenjw on Nov 18, 2004 10:31 AM ]
posted on November 18, 2004 10:55:21 AM
Yes, Helen....... just another guy that figures that females shouldn't have an opinion or be more informed than they think they are so they try to divert the conversation to personal attacks.
And why is it that some of the guys that whine the most and then run away saying 'adios' or 'bye' usually brag that they're packin' heat?
Don't take your guns to town son Leave your guns at home Bill Don't take your guns to town
posted on November 18, 2004 11:54:46 AM
"Come on down Crowfarm". I'm glad you took the effort to save that from months ago. I'm honored. A little jest toward the person who had just spewed some of her filth towards me and others. I didn't say I shot Crowfarms just crows. I didn't know the she was a crow, I just thought she "farmed" them. I now know where all that filth that she spewed came from. She must have taken to eating vermin, roadkill, and pecans. Thanks for letting me in on this. It explains a lot.
And kiara, I don't give a rats a** where you live, except it just shows that you tell one story one day, and another story the next.
posted on November 18, 2004 11:59:47 AM
And don't worry about my masculinity around you two. I wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole, I can smell you from here. Go shave under your arms.
Now back to the discussion, maybe you can tell me what the democrats can do to become the party of the people again. You want intelligent discussions. Try coming up with the reasons that your party is so out of touch.
"All that said, I have enjoyed this board for the past few days, but I don't allow name-calling and negativity in my life, unlike some of you who are thriving on it. So I'm going to mosey along out of here. I'll leave with one last comment: As you probably know, "everyone" in Texas carries a legal gun. I have a small ranch with several pecan trees. Crows eat three things: vermin, roadkill and PECANS. Therefore I shoot crows on sight. CROWfarm, come on down for a visit. Adios all."
You are defining your character and your intelligence all by yourself, etexbill so Kiara and I don't need to say a word to you.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:21:42 PMAnd kiara, I don't give a rats a** where you live, except it just shows that you tell one story one day, and another story the next.
I'm not telling any stories about myself, I didn't bring it up. You were the one that started questioning me yesterday about where I live and then threw a hissy snit fit when I refused to discuss it further so you decided to continue it today.
If you don't give a rats ass about where I live then do the manly thing and drop the subject instead of coming back here and whimpering about it.
What I mean by interesting is her statement was a lie. It had been thought of, been suggested that it might happen and terrrorists had been documented to have had plans to fly a plane into the Eiffel tower at one time. Thanks for the other examples Kiara.
To suggest that it had not been thought of either shows the level of incompetence of the people in charge (Bush administration, suggests that Condi Rice was entirely out of the loop or as I believe is just proof that she is a liar and apparently an incompetent liar at that. Follow the link I provided which even though it is a left of center site uses facts to make the point. And just because you are right of center doesn't mean that a left of center news source is not telling the truth, and vice versa.
And etexbill, the point is we didn't have to know "of a definite planned attack by a plane" to know that it was a possible and plausible terrorist tactic. I mean we didn't know about a definite planned nuclear attack on the US by Iraq but we somehow found a reason to invade a sovereign country.
Condi rose to her level of incompetence as National Security Advisor to the president and has now been promoted because of it. And that is what happens with this administration. To keep people from talking they are promoted. And because they are promoted uninformed people think they have done a good job. Circular reasoning for sure but it works with the uninformed.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:35:52 PM
Exactly what I said. I didn't say I shoot crowfarms on sight,I said I shoot crows on sight. There is a difference.
And that adios was several weeks ago. I decided to come back, just like some of your cohorts have done many times, to see what was going on. As kiara says, I'm free to post what I want. And I'll be back any time that I want. Again, thanks for taking the trouble to remember my past posts. I'm honored.
I believe that my posts have been quiet and intelligent up till now, but that is not what you seem to want. Well, a little explanation is in order. My thoughts about kiara come from her posts when I was here before, griping about this and griping about that in regards to the US government. But then, when confronted, she wouldn't answer the questions posed as to whether she could vote or couldn't because she lived in Canada. She was quick to complain, but then admitted that she didn't post about Canadian politics because no one here is interested in them. In other words, I'll gripe about something that I am not concerned with because I can't complain about my own government because nobody cares. I am easy to get along with and always give people the benefit of the doubt. I am not quick to judge, but something about that attitude rubbed me the wrong way. If you and kiara want to settle down and discuss things in an intelligent manner, then I'm more than ready. If not,
I could not care less. Bill
posted on November 18, 2004 12:36:44 PMAnd don't worry about my masculinity around you two. I wouldn't touch you with a ten foot pole, I can smell you from here. Go shave under your arms.
For someone in your age group this is the best you can come up with?? Sandbox full today? Get a grip!
did you ever imagine that someone would fly an airplane into a building? I doubt it.
Yes a lot of people thought of that and as kiara pointed out this wasn't the first time that planes were used as weapons.
I'm fully aware of the Kamikaze pilots of World War II, I lived thru it. What has that got to do with a terrorist action 60+ years later.
Simple, they are both suicide runs. Since the Reagan years right up to the present the CIA warned that it would be a high possibility that airplanes would be used so this should have been no surprise. But as usual it was all ignored and no one took anything serious as long as the attacks were on foreign soil.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:40:07 PM
getalife: I appreciate you answer.
What I am saying is, all the intelligence of any possible attacks, were gathered in the Clinton administration. Of course, he was involved with other things, and admits this himself.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:44:03 PM
trai: "Since the Reagan years right up to the present the CIA warned that it would be a high possibility that airplanes would be used so this should have been no surprise. But as usual it was all ignored and no one took anything serious as long as the attacks were on foreign soil."
My reply to you is the same as to getalife. Any intelligence to this effect came in the Clinton administration. I read an article recently where Clinton himself says that he was too occupied with his personal troubles to act as he should have against the terrorists.
Condi rose to her level of incompetence as National Security Advisor to the president and has now been promoted because of it. And that is what happens with this administration. To keep people from talking they are promoted. And because they are promoted uninformed people think they have done a good job. Circular reasoning for sure but it works with the uninformed.
Bingo! Blind devotion....hence the term lap dog.
She will have no credibility in any capital in the world. That office requires some distance between her and the president to offer valid advice on international matters and she doesn't have that. She will never be any good in that job no matter how many degrees she has.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:51:42 PMAny intelligence to this effect came in the Clinton administration. I read an article recently where Clinton himself says that he was too occupied with his personal troubles to act as he should have against the terrorists.
Clinton has publicly admitted he should have paid more attention to this problem but you can blame the whole country at large for this obsession with a soap opera. But as I stated this goes way back to the Reagan and Bush Sr. administration. No one took any of it serious until it bit us in the azz.
posted on November 18, 2004 12:59:14 PM
The difference is in her own posts.
Read the above slowly and let your lips move freely.
And I see that you have conveniently left Jimmy Carter's administration out of your post. Don't forget that miserable failure of foreign and military policy.
"Exactly what I said. I didn't say I shoot crowfarms on sight,I said I shoot crows on sight. There is a difference."
No one said that you shot "crowfarms" on sight. Read, etexbill...read. You made the following outrageous statement and then left.
"All that said, I have enjoyed this board for the past few days, but I don't allow name-calling and negativity in my life, unlike some of you who are thriving on it. So I'm going to mosey along out of here. I'll leave with one last comment: "As you probably know, "everyone" in Texas carries a legal gun. I have a small ranch with several pecan trees. Crows eat three things: vermin, roadkill and PECANS. Therefore I shoot crows on sight. CROWfarm, come on down for a visit. "Adios all."
posted on November 18, 2004 01:02:55 PM
trai: here it is again for you.
Remember, read slowly:
I believe that my posts have been quiet and intelligent up till now, but that is not what you seem to want. Well, a little explanation is in order. My thoughts about kiara come from her posts when I was here before, griping about this and griping about that in regards to the US government. But then, when confronted, she wouldn't answer the questions posed as to whether she could vote or couldn't because she lived in Canada. She was quick to complain, but then admitted that she didn't post about Canadian politics because no one here is interested in them. In other words, I'll gripe about something that I am not concerned with because I can't complain about my own government because nobody cares. I am easy to get along with and always give people the benefit of the doubt. I am not quick to judge, but something about that attitude rubbed me the wrong way. If you and kiara want to settle down and discuss things in an intelligent manner, then I'm more than ready. If not,
I could not care less. Bill
posted on November 18, 2004 01:06:37 PM
"Come on down Crowfarm". I'm glad you took the effort to save that from months ago. I'm honored. A little jest toward the person who had just spewed some of her filth towards me and others. I didn't say I shot Crowfarms just crows. I didn't know the she was a crow, I just thought she "farmed" them. I now know where all that filth that she spewed came from. She must have taken to eating vermin, roadkill, and pecans. Thanks for letting me in on this. It explains a lot.
posted on November 18, 2004 01:10:47 PMThe difference is in her own posts. Read the above slowly and let your lips move freely.
Remember, read slowly:
Keep your sarcasm to yourself. You talk about intelligent conversation and act like a three year old when addressing others. If you find Helen and Kiara or anyone else upsets you this much just ignore their posts and don't get involved.
And I see that you have conveniently left Jimmy Carter's administration out of your post. Don't forget that miserable failure of foreign and military policy.
I find it ridiculous to dump everything in Clintons lap when there was enough blame to go back years and then up to this administration. So sorry that I forgot ole Jimmy. Yes by all means let us nail his sorry azz to the wall also. We could go right back to George Washington if you like but this discussion is about Condi.
posted on November 18, 2004 01:11:33 PM
No one said that you shot "crowfarms" on sight. Read, etexbill...read. You made the following outrageous statement and then left.
"All that said, I have enjoyed this board for the past few days, but I don't allow name-calling and negativity in my life, unlike some of you who are thriving on it. So I'm going to mosey along out of here. I'll leave with one last comment:
"As you probably know, "everyone" in Texas carries a legal gun. I have a small ranch with several pecan trees. Crows eat three things: vermin, roadkill and PECANS. Therefore I shoot crows on sight. CROWfarm, come on down for a visit.
"Adios all
Exactly my point again. Read slowly. Read Now you want to hear outrageous, go back and read some of crowfarms and maggies filth.
posted on November 18, 2004 01:21:27 PM
Trai, I think etexbill is a bit upset because I didn't stoop down to his level. You have my picture and know how tall I stand.
Even on his Walmart plastic pedestal he can't gain any stature.
