posted on January 23, 2005 06:10:52 AM new
That is interesting to know profe, so home schoolers do not take the standardized tests as same as those attending public schools?
I was under the impression that even home schooling had a "curriculm" to follow?
posted on January 23, 2005 08:06:29 AM new
12 they do. The mother that I know does have a circullum and does follow it. As I said she even has a room in her home set up like a school room where she say they go every day for their schooling. These are great polite children. They have everything the unified does even up to the field trips. Of course you will always see someone abuse it but I hope it is not the normal. If I remember correctly either last year ot the year before a home schooler won the spelling bee. I envy either a mother or father that can teach their children as it is more time they spend with them and not with the loosers that most school districts have. I know I couldn't.
_________________
posted on January 23, 2005 09:24:26 AM new
Maggie,
I do not think so. I have a co-worker that home schools his child. I do not think his wife has a teaching degree. The next time he is in town I will ask him.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on January 23, 2005 12:42:12 PM new
twelve - Different states and even different localities have different rules. But all homeschooled children are test in some fashion. Some states like CA require parents to be a licensed teach...and they have to follow STATE guidelines. They pretty much set limits so high it's hard for parents to teach their own.
--------
Teacher's associations do not set curriculum policy. No matter what you've been led to believe, they just don't. Curriculum is set by district action, following state and federal guidelines.
Profe.....teachers have one of the strongest unions that exist. They have a ton of influence about what goes on in the schools. I haven't been led to believe anything false. That's the most major roadblock for making any changes in the schools....the teachers unions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Four More Years....YES!!!
posted on January 23, 2005 02:01:16 PM newALERT!! THIS IS A PARODY, POKING FUN AT THE ULTRA RELIGIOUS RIGHT BIBLE THUMPING NUTBARS...CAUTION IT MAY CAUSE SOME OF YOU PINCHED MOUTHED SOUR PUSS OLD CRONES TO CRACK YOUR FACES AND SMILE..
Pastor Exposes Perverted Little Cartoon Character
Action Alert!
Complete shock filled the Landover Baptist main sanctuary last Sunday as Pastor Deacon Fred revealed in graphic detail, decadent hidden sexual messages in the popular cartoon series, Sponge Bob, Square Pants™. Mrs. Ida Denkins, who was seated in the first pew, fainted in the middle of the presentation and had to be rushed to Landover Baptist Hospital. Church usher, Bob Halburg, had an immediate reaction to the slide show that went straight to his stomach. He vomited so forcefully that pieces of his steaming breakfast were sprayed across nearly 15 pews. All total, at least two-dozen church members became physically ill after being exposed to the disgusting garbage that Hollywood is pumping into our children’s heads.
“I found out about this disgusting little yellow cartoon character, quite by accident,” said Pastor Deacon Fred. “I was laying on the couch with my grandson, and must have fallen asleep, so he was unmonitored in front of the television set. When I woke up, my head had leaned back over the side of the couch. My neck was craned in such a way that I was looking at the television set upside down. I reacted immediately to what I saw there, and was able to flip over and grab my grandson by his hair and fling him across the room, thankfully, knocking him unconscious long enough for me to get to the remote control and switch back to Fox news, where they were showing Godly footage of our Christian troops blowing up ignorant Arabiacs. I have no idea how much mental damage my grandson suffered while he was exposed to that cartoon show while I was asleep, but I’ll tell you what, I won’t hesitate to sue the bastards that put this junk on TV if we find out anything happened to my grandson!”
Pastor explained to the congregation that he ordered a team of Creation Scientists, led by Dr. Jonathan Edwards, to spare no expense on opening up a full investigation into the lewd cartoon character, Sponge Bob, Square Pants™. “I ordered our Christian team not to stop their investigation until they pulled out every single lewd, disgusting, sexual reference in the cartoon,” said Pastor.
The two-hour slide presentation seen on Sunday morning was the result of an investigation that lasted nearly six months. The full findings of that investigation cannot be revealed on this public web site, since there is currently a pending lawsuit between the Landover Baptist Church and the Nickelodeon Channel. We can however, say that most of what we found is too shocking for words. Innocent little Christian children might be reading this article and they should not be exposed to the decadent smut of Sponge Bob, Square Pants™, anymore than they already have been.
“From what we’ve found,” says Dr. Edwards, “is that we have what appears to be a little yellow sponge who talks like a pervert. When you turn it upside down, there are two unmistakable testicles and a semi-erect penis hanging from its face. Thank Jesus that children are not watching this program standing on their heads, or we’d all be in trouble.” Dr. Edwards also revealed that the entire cartoon series has houses, plants, animals, and demon-like creatures (most of which are shaped like sex organs) floating around, talking nonsense. “One purple penis shaped creature even moans and giggles uncontrollably whenever he sees one of his ‘pals,’ like he is secretly masturbating himself to them.”
“As True Christians™, what we find most frightening is that for the most part, the majority of sex organs we’ve found in the cartoon, can only be seen upside down,” continued Dr. Edwards. We played several sound tracks for the show backwards as well, and it’s all demon talk.” True Christians™ know that one of Satan’s favorite ways of communicating to his followers is to do things backwards, and upside down. “We know this from our studies of Satanism, but we had no idea that it was being used in the media – especially in children’s cartoons.”
“Is it okay for a person to take off their pants and walk around upside down so that his penis and testicles look like his nose and eyes? NO! So why should we allow a cartoon character to do the same thing while standing right side up? It’s ludicrous!” said Pastor Deacon Fred. “There is no doubt that we need to put a stop to this so-called, Sponge Bob, and his Square Penis. If we don’t, we'll soon be coming home to houses full of children, stripped of their clothes, hand walking around the living room spitting gibberish! We’ve already got our lawyers preparing a lawsuit.”
[ edited by maggiemuggins on Jan 24, 2005 08:16 AM ]
posted on January 23, 2005 02:28:20 PM new
Thank, Maggie, makes the fools who object to
Sponge Bob look like the idiots they are.....but no response from the neonazicons??????
linduh still hasn't explained "indocinating children with "garage".
posted on January 24, 2005 02:00:43 AM new
Linda - go back and read you links... Start with the World News Daily article where you will learn that California is one of 12 states where home-schooling is accomplished under a private school exemption.
As for my statement about the parents that can't be bothered... it was not referring to people that choose to home school as opposed to putting their kids in public schools. It refers to people who CLAIM to home school because they just can't be bothered to get their kids up and out to school. When contacted about extended absenses they simply report their kids as being homeschooled rather than deal with California laws which allow for the punishment of parents in cases of extreme truancy.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
If it's really "common" sense, why do so few people actually have it?
posted on January 24, 2005 04:24:08 AM newThat is interesting to know profe, so home schoolers do not take the standardized tests as same as those attending public schools?
Some do, some don't. It depends entirely on the state. Here, they're not required to.
profe-just curious-what do you teach?
6th through 8th grades, math, language, science and social studies.
12 they do. The mother that I know does have a circullum and does follow it
Libra, has it ever occurred to you that your experience with one homeschool family may not exactly describe all homeschool families in all states?
Doesn't the parent who will be doing the home schooling have to have some kind of teaching credentials?
Not usually.
But all homeschooled children are test in some fashion.
You're mistaken Linda, it just isn't so. Many are tested, many aren't.
Profe.....teachers have one of the strongest unions that exist. They have a ton of influence about what goes on in the schools. I haven't been led to believe anything false. That's the most major roadblock for making any changes in the schools....the teachers unions.
Never the less, as I originally said, curiculum is set by school districts, following requirements determined by the states, which in turn have followed federal guidelines. Curiculum is not set by teacher's associations.
____________________________________________
Dick Cheney: "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11..."
posted on January 24, 2005 04:46:43 AM new
No Profe, work slowdown is set by the teachers. Since teachers can't strike that is the next best thing. They take it out on the student, which it is not the students fault.
In Wisconsin you have to register so that the state can send the circullum and also send the school district that students name. Home schoolers only have to teach what is necessary for a diploma. I see nothing wrong with home schooling if it is done right and yes some parents say they do it but they don't. The only one that suffers is the child.
Profe, you have to admitt that the teachers union is one of the strongest in the country. I think tenure needs to be redone and it shouldn't be given after two years. Not every teacher is good and I think evaluations have to be given and if they don't perform up to standard , as in other jobs out they go but with tenure they can't touch that teacher.
posted on January 24, 2005 04:56:43 AM new
"Libra, has it ever occurred to you that your experience with one home school family may not exactly describe all homeschool families in all states?"
I was just relating to what I know about the large group in our city that does home schooling. I said I knew one home schooler from that group, but she belongs to a large group that meets regularly.
I can only speak from what I know about this group of home schoolers. I never said anything about any other home schoolers either in Wisconsin or any other state.
posted on January 24, 2005 04:58:10 AM new
Maggie, you're right up there with Dan Rather on reporting skills.
The Landover Baptist Church is a SPOOF SITE. Your whole article is a joke. LITERALLY A JOKE. The whole site was set up to parady the "Moarl Majority".
--------------------------------------
Replay Media - The best source for board games, card games and miniatures on the web! http://www.replaymedia.com
posted on January 24, 2005 05:26:51 AM newProfe, you have to admitt that the teachers union is one of the strongest in the country. I think tenure needs to be redone and it shouldn't be given after two years.
Tenure, what a big bugaboo this is. I think much of the misconception about it comes out of nothing more than jealousy. Most folks who work in the non academic world don't have a lot of job security, and it bugs them to see someone who does. Never mind that the salary and benefits of that person will never approach those of the business world.
All tenure does is guarantee a right to due process. It may make it difficult to capriciously fire a teacher. What's wrong with that? A teacher who is not working to the expectations of his or her district, or who is otherwise negligent in his duties can always be gotten rid of, tenured or not. It's simply a matter of following the procedures of due process as set forth in local school board policy. I'll give you an example. In my state, there is nothing called "tenure" for K-12 teachers. A teacher hired into a district is considered "probationary" for his or her first three annual contracts. At any point during this time, his administrator can basically let him go without much more than two week's notice. Upon signing the fourth contract, the teacher is said to be a "continuing" teacher. From then on, as long as contracts run consecutively, that status is maintained. Probationary teachers are evaluated by their principals twice yearly, continuing teachers once. If a principal at any time decides that a continuing teacher has serious shortcomings, he will be placed on a written professional improvement plan and given time, normally 3 months, to reach an improvement goal. At the end of this time, the principal may recommend to the local board that the teacher has satisfied the plan, or, if not, that the teacher be immediately placed on administrative leave for the remainder of his contract, or that his contract not be renewed. Notification of nonrenewal for continuing teachers must be sent no later than April 25th. Most districts, mine included, also have a safety clause in their board policy which throws out the due process guidelines if the physical or emotional safety of students is at risk.
"He's tenured, we can't do anything about it", is an excuse used by lazy or fearful administrators, who are afraid to do their jobs.
____________________________________________
Dick Cheney: "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11..."
posted on January 24, 2005 05:50:14 AM new
"Never mind that the salary and benefits of that person will never approach those of the business world."
Now I don't want this to turn into a shouting match but I have to disagree.
i.e. My sister was a teacher for 40 years. Retired at 55 with some unbelievable benefits, which when I retired from the medical field at age 45 with nothing. She made more retired than she did while teaching and her teachers salary was in the upper thousands for many years. The business world does not have benefits like the teachers do. The teachers are now crying because they might have to pay for some of their medical insurance, which I had to pay half of mine.
posted on January 24, 2005 06:49:02 AM new
Over and over and over libra, no matter what the topic, she pulls out of her butt somebody she knows who does this or that and because she knows ONE person who did this or that then it must be true for everybody. OR SAYS she knows this person....
Libra you're just plain lying or
Teeny, tiny, little weesnsy, itty bitty tiny life......
posted on January 24, 2005 07:06:57 AM new
Personally, I feel home schooling is a bad idea. I don't feel home schooled kids get the same type of socialization as kids that attend regular schools.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on January 24, 2005 08:03:44 AM new
Logan - I always felt the same way but I have to say that I think it depends on how it is done. There are sports teams that home schooled students can join in order to be get that socialization and other types of activities.
I think there are two very different basic reasons that parents choose to home school. Some do it to shelter their kids from outside influences and beliefs. I think those are the onles that do their kids a tremendous disservice and whose kids do have problems adapting in the real world. Others do it because they believe that they can give their child a better education on a one on one basis than can be given in an overcrowded school but still understand that need outside socialization.
I know a couple that home schooled three of their kids back before it became quite so big a deal as it is now. All three went on to become honor students at Colorado School of Mines (http://www.mines.edu/all_about/) and are great guys.
~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~ • ~~~
If it's really "common" sense, why do so few people actually have it?
posted on January 24, 2005 08:11:30 AM new
Oh for god's sake, Libra.. if you are so dumb that you can't tell it is a joke.. or a spoof or a parody..when you read one... then I give up... do you have no sense of humor what so ever? Have you ever laughed?
..okay.. from now on ... I will print in bold letters.. This is a Joke or Parody Folks, beware, you may have to crack a smile Maggie
For you and the other humor challenged people here, please note....that I have added a note to my original post..warning the not to bright that the article is a joke.. sheesh.. like talking to a 2 year old.
[ edited by maggiemuggins on Jan 24, 2005 08:19 AM ]
posted on January 24, 2005 08:29:44 AM new
Profe, "lazy or fearful administrators" is a big catchall. The local school district justifies their administrative expense ad nauseum. But the fact remains, after cutting all of the school nurses, reading experts, and music teachers the top heaviness in administrators stands out like a sore richard. Plus I note your circumlocution, "Curiculum is not set by teacher's associations." OK, but the responsible parties that do set curriculum's are teacher association members and subscribe to a mind set that is in lock-step with many of the major failings in our educational system.
Many of America's teachers are dedicated professionals that aspire to help young minds to bloom. However, the majority feel an entitlement to their salary, and future administrative positions, that should not be a given. Too many educator's today view their job description as continuing their paycheck and sand-bagging their entrenchment; and it would be a much nicer job without those pesky little maggots around. Ask any college professor what they think of the preparation their incoming Freshmen have to meet college requirements.
Education in America is in sad sad shape. The teacher association's are part of the problem, not part of the solution. A BIG part of the problem.
__________
liberalism, the last bastion of elitism
[ edited by parklane64 on Jan 24, 2005 08:30 AM ]
posted on January 24, 2005 10:13:54 AM new Ya right you knew it was a parody. I didn't read so get over yourself
According to what I read in some states home schoolers can join school districts extra curricular activities. Of course that is if they want to. I also think they can go to the Proms. Since they pay taxes they should be allow some of the privileges of a school district.
Profe in the city where I have lived for over 30 years many of the school board members are retired school teachers and I think if the teachers want something that is a plus for them not necessarily for the school district.
"Personally, I feel home schooling is a bad idea. I don't feel home schooled kids get the same type of socialization as kids that attend regular schools."
Logansdad why do you think that. What is the alternative? Any ideas?
posted on January 24, 2005 10:29:53 AM new
You crazy old fool....you make a big thing about commenting on a post that you say you haven't even read! Oh.. Lady... you are beyond help...
Libra posts: Ya right you knew it was a parody. I didn't read so get over yourself
posted on January 24, 2005 11:03:15 AM new
fenix: I think there are two very different basic reasons that parents choose to home school. Some do it to shelter their kids from outside influences and beliefs. I think those are the onles that do their kids a tremendous disservice and whose kids do have problems adapting in the real world.
I couldn't agree more with you. Children need to learn about what goes on in the real world, even if it contradicts what their parent's believe. Isolating children from the evils in society will only do more harm to a child in the long run.
Others do it because they believe that they can give their child a better education on a one on one basis than can be given in an overcrowded school but still understand that need outside socialization.
Yes overcrowding is one problem with schools today. If a parent wants to home school their children, I do not have a problem with that as long as the parent goes along with the standards set by the state. I also feel that a parent should be "tested" to see if they are "qualified" to home school their child. If a parent can't read or write themselves, they are in no shape to try and teach their own child.
Absolute faith has been shown, consistently, to breed intolerance. And intolerance, history teaches us, again and again, begets violence.
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on January 24, 2005 11:07:08 AM new
Maggie, Maggie, Maggie.....reasoning with Lala is impossible...she has no reasoning ability. She must be on drugs...hard to believe anybody could be like that NORMALLY !!!!
posted on January 24, 2005 12:46:23 PM new
profe: I couldn't disagree more when you say:
Tenure, what a big bugaboo this is. I think much of the misconception about it comes out of nothing more than jealousy.
[and when you refer to earnings teachers make]
The teachers unions control the schools and everything that goes on there. To believe otherwise is to be denying reality. The unions don't work in the best interests of our school children....they're just like any other business in that they are for the TEACHERS best interests....and that's exactly why the school system has been failing way too many of our young people.
Heck...even a WashingtonPost article had teachers responding that 1/3 of their own should be fired/removed. Tenure, after two years, only incourages more 'who cares' attitudes because they no it would take a parting of the seas to get them out.
No Teacher Left Behind Unions don't have children's best interests at heart.
BY TERRY M. MOE
Saturday, January 22, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST
(Editor's note: This article appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 13.)
The teachers unions have more influence over the public schools than any other group in American society. They influence schools from the bottom up, through collective bargaining activities that shape virtually every aspect of school organization. And they influence schools from the top down, through political activities that shape government policy. They are the 800-pound gorillas of public education. Yet the American public is largely unaware of how influential they are--and how much they impede efforts to improve public schools.
The problem is not that the unions are somehow bad or ill-intentioned. They aren't. The problem is that when they simply do what all organizations do--pursue their own interests--they are inevitably led to do things that are not in the best interests of children.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Four More Years....YES!!!
LOL - The latest update is all the angry letters that this writer's views have brought down on the WSJ. Truth hurts....he's only speaking the truth when he states what teachers are against...and what they support.
posted on January 24, 2005 01:24:10 PM new
And to answer your questions, logansdad, about WHAT indoctrination I'm referring to this is a great example....a 2001 article...but we can see that in 2005 that's just what's going on in our schools here.
---
Overworked, underpaid, but respected by all, the teacher used to be one of the pillar of society. Over recent decades, however, the teaching profession has traded professionalism and dedication for unionism and selfish pursuits. Off and on, labour unrest within the teaching profession has been disrupting schooling across the continent, and parents no longer believe that teachers are on their team or have the best interests of our children at heart.
From the strength gained through their unions, teachers have become intransigent and have adopted the arrogant position of telling parents and elected governments what will be taught and how it will be taught. Together with the academic elitists that train the modern-day, "progressive" teachers, the unions have adopted a policy of social engineering through brainwashing, so students will embrace the socialistic dogma of egalitarian political-correctness.
Nowhere has this become more evident than in the garbage they teach in social curriculums variously called "Family Life, Self and Society, Growth and Development, and Equity Studies." First it was sensitive subjects, then sex education, AIDS awareness, and finally sexual orientation. All, subjects taught against the wishes of most parents and best left for discussion in the home, not the schools.
During their convention in Los Angeles this summer the 10,000 delegates of America's largest teachers' union, the National Education Association (NEA), adopted a dozen resolutions promoting "Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Education." Indoctrination is to start in kindergarten or earlier if possible. At the convention the NEA even called for "programs in the public schools for children from birth through age eight."
All barriers and restrictions for homosexuals are to be removed in schools. In fact, the NEA will initiate an affirmative action program promoting the hiring of homosexual teachers to make schools "more inclusive." And the subject of homosexuality is to be threaded through all curriculums, so parents won't be able to "opt out."
Canadian schools and their homosexual friends have not yet formalized a battle plan, mainly, because our teachers' unions are not national organizations. However, we're getting there-doing it piecemeal. On August 15, 2001, at their annual meeting, the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario overwhelmingly passed a resolution to lobby school boards to fund gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender material for kindergarten to grade 8 classes. Of 800 teacher-delegates, only 20 voted against the resolution.
And, according to a news item on TV, Health Canada has just sent out their latest sex survey for grade 7 and 8 students. One of questions wants to know whether the student is attracted to the opposite sex, same sex, or both sexes. Another asks how many times the student has engaged in oral sex. No doubt, as a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Canada is working to a timetable in order to further the UN agenda. Why American schools are rushing to corrupt their future generations, however, is unclear.
Phyllis Benedict, president of the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario, said the union is "trying to promote a more positive environment in schools". She said, "We just want to make sure that in our schools we have the best resources for all of our children that address today's society." And a teacher, interviewed on a talk show, said that children as young as four should learn about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues. She felt that this was necessary to foster respect for gays, make students more tolerant, and schools more inclusive and safer for gay students and teachers. Gay students in kindergarten? Give us a break! More inclusive? In that case, shouldn't schools also respect drug addiction and protect drug pushers? And since when is respect bestowed on the basis of sexual activity-heterosexual or otherwise?
For our schools to sanction homosexuality as a normal, acceptable lifestyle is criminally irresponsible and is based on misconceptions. It is outrageous! Homosexual behaviour is a dangerous lifestyle that is simply a morbid addiction to sexual perversion. It should be discouraged, not fostered by our schools.
Just what are our teachers and their unions trying to impose on society, if not the social engineering of the nation's future generations? Our teachers are no longer working in the best interests of our children but, rather, advancing the sordid agenda of a very small, powerful group devoted to a perverted lifestyle.
As a grim reminder of the strides the homosexual activists have made in just a few years, it becomes necessary, once again, to quote some of the ranting of Michael Swift, homosexual writer, who authored a well-known essay entitled, "For The Homoerotic Order" in the Boston Gay Community News, February 15-21, 1987. His essay is prefaced by the statement "This essay is outre, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor." Unbelievably, his mad fantasy has turned into tragic reality with consequences society refuses to face.
Here, in part, is what he wrote "We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms. . . . Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
"All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. . . . If you dare to cry #*!@, fairy, queer at us, we will stab you. . . . Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable. . . .
"We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. . . .
"The family unit--spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated, Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.
"All churches who condemn us will be closed. Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks."
Well, today the heterosexual population is the "oppressed," and homosexual activists are seducing our sons and daughters in our schools, and they get the full support and blessing of the teachers' unions. Together, they have now set the machinery in motion to brainwash and socially engineer future generations in accordance with Michael Swift's mad fantasy of homosexual domination and oppression.
All laws curbing homosexuality have been revoked in Canada, and the government now recognizes and protects any kind of homosexual partnership. The passage of the hate-crime bill has established homosexuals as an elite group with special privileges and protection, and no one "dares cry #*!@" or pervert anymore. Both homosexuality and bisexuality have become a fad in our society, and anyone showing distaste or disapproval is branded as a bigot or homophobe.
The family unit is constantly challenged in today's society, and recent court decisions have supported the unnatural conception of children through artificial insemination for subsequent adoption by homosexual couples. And parents who spank their children stand to have them taken away by the government, which may well place them in the foster care of adult homosexuals.
[b]Should there be any doubt about the malignant pervasiveness of the homosexual movement in our schools and social infrastructure, look up http://www.youth.org/loco/PERSONProject/
With the attitude of our federal government and the teachers' unions, legalized pedophilia is just around the corner.
Ya right you knew it was a parody. I didn't read so get over yourself
I wonder how much of it is a dumb act..it's just so dam irritating..