posted on January 26, 2006 02:03:14 PMIt's interesting to see that some of you... .
Here again, you have to wonder who exactly this "some of you" is..
And, "interesting" is what chickshi8 people say because they are scared #*!@*less to have a real opinion!! But want to tell other people:[and have the courage to honestly say how they feel]~~~~~~~~LOL!!! What a riot! But practice makes perfect, stay on your meds and keep trying. Maybe they will come out with a combo cocktail that will do the trick for a pitifully damaged child who is so mentally challenged with narcissism they think every and anything is about them and likes to courageously state opinions with the words "some of us" alot.
posted on January 26, 2006 03:56:30 PMOne word from me, and the the two cackling geese over here are spinning out of control all evening, I see,
What you failed to see is that after we made a couple of brief comments we quickly moved on because you weren't interesting enough to discuss any longer. Whereas you have made it your lifetime's work to follow each and every word I say, hanging on in anticipation of each post I make.
Doesn't it get embarrassing after awhile showing your overt obsession?
Get a life, sweetie.
BTW, you really shouldn't mix meds with combo cocktails...... it could be dangerous.
posted on January 26, 2006 05:20:16 PMand ended 13 years of Liberal rule, giving Canada a leader who was expected to move the country to the right on social and economic issues and bolster ties with the United States.
Just like our own ending of the 'liberal rule' in the mid 90's. Such pretty words.
Great beginning Canadian voters....you're finally seeing the light.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 26, 2006 05:21:55 PM
"It's interesting to see that some of you find opposing opinions so threatening. If you were in business it would most likely destroy you the minute you hit the real world and faced any competition."
yea but we dont see Canada as competition....just our poor next door neighbor who has to beat seals to death with baseball bats to make money.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beauty is only a light switch away
[ edited by classicrock000 on Jan 26, 2006 05:28 PM ]
posted on January 26, 2006 05:25:27 PMchallenged with narcissism they think every and anything is about them and likes to courageously state opinions with the words "some of us" alot.
LOL...agreed and 'some of us' is used by those who can't stand alone....on their own positions. Might makes right to some. LOL
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 26, 2006 05:32:05 PM
You moved on because double didnt come back to play with you! You had no choice. LOL!!!
Get a life, sweetie.
Why have I missed something only being here at dinnertime, breakfast time and lunchtime?! Is that how the lie of your frivolous little follow around games go? Dont forget to get all the posts in email so you dont miss anything now. And Dont worry, nobody knows the real truth.
Whereas you have made it your lifetime's work to follow each and every word I say,
Well yes, miss narcisssy strap on dickie self-proclaimed dog bitchee. doncha know, I am trying desperately not to get on colin's A-List (thats really really important to me) so I have to follow you around to define what not to post here. Some of us, and even many of us dont have our own personality you see..::eyeroll:: So we just copy copy copy.
You know whats really sad for you? Everytime you even try to kick it on some intellectual level you make yourself such a fool!! rofl!!Postering: I know what it takes to be a leader and *I* could run this military..yes sir ree Bob! snort snort...hahahaha!! Go back to directing your paint to dry properly on your walls ,kiara. Thats about the only thing you can have any power over. Youre a pebble next to my paramount. Has your rock star boyfriend ever told you you were big time? No. I didnt think so. I'm off to find my old QB boyfriend to see if he wants to explain that remark to me.
ta-ta to you and your cheap jewelry.
posted on January 26, 2006 06:05:40 PM
Classic, you misunderstood what I said. I was talking about the attitude of a few on this forum who are unable to accept an opposing view or any criticism about their leader so resort to personal attacks. In business, a person has to take the good with the bad from the competition and that helps them to grow, to learn and to survive.
LOL...agreed and 'some of us' is used by those who can't stand alone....on their own positions. Might makes right to some. LOL
lindak, before you jump too quickly on the 'some of us', please note that I said 'some of you'. ("Some of us" was used by washingtonebayer)
Trust me, I can survive on my own here. Whereas "some of you" have to constantly team up with those who relish in crude comments, call names and make everything personal whenever you are unable to actually discuss an issue with any intelligence or knowledge.
posted on January 26, 2006 06:14:56 PM
TCS Daily Canadian Military, No Oxymoron By Austin Bay : BIO | 26 Jan 2006
Take two apparently contradictory terms, and link them in a single phrase. The result is an oxymoron, a figure of speech yoking a perceived contradiction in terms. "Military intelligence" almost always rates a chuckle, as does "jumbo shrimp." A skilled poet can use an oxymoron to stir emotions beyond laughter. Shakespeare riddled the tragedy of "Romeo and Juliet" with incongruous verbal jolts like "cold fire" and "happy daggers."
The term "Canadian military" should never be an oxymoron, but after a decade of reduction and decline, what was once one of the world's most able and elite combat organizations is now a hollow force.
The slide in defense funding that began in the mid-1990s is one cause. The current Canadian defense budget buys about 25 percent less bang and less peacekeeping than it did 10 years ago.
With the end of the Cold War, some reduction in force structure was understandable. The defense cuts, however, weren't simply based on a strategic assessment of finances and the disappearance of the Soviet Union.
Post-Cold War, North American geography played a role. Here's that presumption: The United States would always be there to defend Canada, so why bother maintaining military forces?
That wasn't always Canada's defense philosophy. At one time, when it came to defending liberty and democracy, Canada punched way above its weight class, and the Free World was thankful.
Prior to Pearl Harbor, while the United States hid behind the false wall of "neutrality," Canada confronted with armed force the cultural and political threat of fascist tyrants. At the end of World War II, Canada had the world's third-largest navy. In 2006, despite having the globe's second-largest nation in terms of landmass, Canada deploys only three dozen or so warships and naval support vessels.
Over a million Canadians served during World War II, out of a population of 12 million. Today, the expeditionary military that Nazi Germany feared must juggle troops and equipment to sustain two battalion-sized task forces in an overseas deployment.
The Nazis did indeed fear and respect Canada. From Sicily to Normandy and on into Germany, veteran Canadian divisions often formed the "hard core" of an allied thrust. That wasn't a conspiracy by London to "let the colonials be cannon fodder" -- it was a recognition of Canadian military capabilities and fighting spirit.
Canada's military continues to attract outstanding men and women. I have yet to meet or serve with a Canadian soldier who failed to impress me with his professionalism and discipline. In my experience -- in terms of individual, quality personnel -- only Australian troops match Canadians on a one-for-one basis.
Two years ago, I had the privilege of serving with Australian troops in Iraq. The Aussies are crack. In the mid-1970s, I had the privilege of working with the 4th Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group in then-West Germany. In my opinion, the Canadian brigade was the best brigade in NATO, which probably meant at that moment in time it was the best brigade man-for-man in the world.
Today, Canada has too few of these fine troops, and the superior troops Canada does field are not supplied with the modern, first-rate weapons and equipment they deserve -- at least, not in sufficient numbers.
The lack of military punch weakens Canada as a global political player, because Canada cannot act with a full spectrum of foreign policy options.
In many ways, the Canadian rhetorical and political game of "We Aren't America" is a reasonable, if semi-hypocritical posture. The game has actually benefited the great cause of freedom. In Cold War situations where American troops or observers might have escalated tensions, Canadians could provide security, stability and democratic presence. Canada could be the United States without Washington's alleged baggage. Those of us who understood the stakes were thankful.
However, as the Canadian military declined, the Canadian "We Aren't America" game -- particularly under Paul Martin's Liberals -- degenerated into rank, adolescent anti-Americanism. Is there a connection between increasingly strident, appeasement-laden rhetoric and the loss of military capability? I think the answer is "yes."
Canada's Conservatives have managed a narrow victory and now confront the challenges of a coalition government. Let's hope the first consensus Canadians reach is to restore and revive the Canadian military.
-------
Austin Bay is a syndicated columnist and contributor to TCS Daily.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 26, 2006 06:31:20 PM
Hi Linda. Nice to see you back on the boards.
Boy did you hit the nail on the head with her. Always talking to random user names when she should be talking into her mirror mirror.
Classic, some people only get what they can steal.... or as you mentioned clubbing a seal. kiara fancies herself some queen amazon woman or something and the only one in the world who knows how to run a business! As if that is even comparable to the Military? Talk about misinformed!
posted on January 26, 2006 07:11:39 PM
lindak, I am not the one that constantly makes the crude comments here nor have I ever teamed up with anyone like that. You are the one that encourages and supports those who constantly speak the filth. The dirtier they talk, the more you are attracted to the likes of them.
In fact you relish in it so much I once suggested you and another start your own dirty thread. You haven't changed at all. You’ve never been able to rise above it.
Enjoy, it's about all you know and what you know best.
posted on January 26, 2006 08:10:13 PM
kiara - There is NO DOUBT in my mind that any rational/non-delusional reader here KNOWS your statements about me are false. Of course, that isn't within YOUR OWN abilities to see/observe....no surprise there for me.
Like I've said before....that's YOUR problem.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 26, 2006 08:17:03 PM
Kiara, I'm glad to hear about your new house. I bet it looks pretty cool. I was out in BC once and fell in love with the scenery, the fresh air and the climate. I'm envious.
posted on January 26, 2006 08:58:59 PM
Kraft, you need good windows out there. We're always kidding family and friends in Ontario that when their crocuses are blooming we’re already swimming out here.
posted on January 26, 2006 09:14:59 PMWell yes, miss narcisssy strap on dickie self-proclaimed dog bitchee.
Kraftdinner when I want lip from you I will unzip my pants.
Those are just two comments today from your biggest supporters, lindak. They are also the two posters that you have always favored here, no matter what IDs they return with and no matter how crude they become.
And let’s not forget your other supporter that got booted under a couple of IDs also for his crude comments to women and how you started a thread whining about his disappearance and now you long for his return.
Facts are facts. You support it and you love it. Don’t let the truth hurt you.
posted on January 26, 2006 10:20:45 PM
And here we have the childish kiara pointing out the words of others....and, of course putting the blame for THEIR posts on my shoulders....or I should say trying to place the blame on me. Suppose you'd let me place the blame for all the vile, vulgar things said by liberals like mingotree/logansdad/etc. here also....yeah...I'm just SURE you would accept that as YOUR responsibility as they share a lot of your views. LOL
You really need to grow up kiara....we're all adults here and I don't post for anyone except myself.
Get real....come into the adult world where freedom of speech works both ways....from YOUR side and from those who I agree with politically....and those I agree with about YOU and your actions, kiara.
Now....go play with your 'friends' and quit trying to blame me for everything not right in your little fantasy world. LOL
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 26, 2006 10:38:25 PM
Thanks Colin...I had a wonderful time. No listening to, reading about nor hearing the most recent liberal whining in the news the whole time I was gone. No angry, frustrated democrats/liberals to contend with...
posted on January 26, 2006 11:07:21 PM
Once again you have trouble with comprehension, lindak. Let me put it this way.
I'm not blaming you at all.
In fact I am the one that constantly has to remind you that we are each responsible for our own posts each time you play victim and whine to me when others insult you.
Vendio is ripe these days with foul-mouthed little posters.
I'm just noting that each time they make a crude comment and disrupt the thread, you are usually the first to LOL and suck up to them.
You love it, you always have. Facts are facts.
dblfugger has different versions of it, Kraft. She said it under her neroter ID too.
lindak always loves to hear it and encourages her and agrees with her so dblfugger/neroter eagerly pleases her master by offering up more.
posted on January 27, 2006 02:16:30 AM
kiara is are nothing but a liar and a lowlife.
It is YOU who cannot take an opposing opinion without making it personal. My words are true and very apropos. Something you cant manage to do, can you? Everytime words spill from your brain to your keyboard, you show what a terribly damaged sociopath you are.
You cant deal with anybody that outshines you, is way smarter than you, or anyone who easily (easily) sees your pompous opinions exactly for the foolish crap they are: a joke. So you put on your little dickie for "cramming it up somebody azz" -- (..your favorite saying ).. and go around trying to find someone to get your mental fx on with. I sees it and calls it exactly right. Your allegations about people are all false.
Youre sick kiara, and anybody reading these boards for any length of time already knows that.
posted on January 27, 2006 06:58:31 AM
What is really amusing is that kraftdinner and kiara both do what kiara claims you do linda.
one of the other will not have posted for some time and boy when one gets made out for the fool they are the other mysteriously appears for "support". LOL
pot, black, kettle. yeah those words fit kiara.
Ron
"I'm so depressed. My doctor refused to write me a
prescription for Viagra. He said it would be like putting
a new flagpole on a condemned building."
posted on January 27, 2006 07:33:28 AMone of the other will not have posted for some time and boy when one gets made out for the fool they are the other mysteriously appears for "support".
washingtonebayer, I work so I don't have all day to sit here as some of you do. I'm here off and on, and I've been here for years so I do not 'mysteriously appear' ever.
You are describing the ones that gets booted or are embarrased at their own behavior and sneak back under another ID only to align themselves with the same posters and then troll and lie and attack once again because they feel inferior when faced with intelligent conversation.
They are unable to accept that others may have opposing views so they become helpless and frustrated, and then resort to sexual insults. Sound familiar?
posted on January 27, 2006 07:44:55 AM
Sure kiara that's your story if you like, it doesn't wash and you know it but if you want to continue to make those false claims, hey that is your opinion and born of ignorance.
Lets see kraftdinner will be on next. LOL
Ron
"I'm so depressed. My doctor refused to write me a
prescription for Viagra. He said it would be like putting
a new flagpole on a condemned building."
posted on January 27, 2006 07:45:57 AM
BTW, I have never denied saying the 'cram it up your azz' comment to lindak when she continually insulted me a few years ago.
Others became fixated with the comment and took it to new levels. It seems to be the only place their heads have been since and they can't stop thinking about it.
posted on January 27, 2006 08:11:35 AMBTW, I have never denied saying the 'cram it up your azz' ...others became fixated with the comment
How can others become fixated with it when it yours? Wear it kiara. You said it and you get to wear it. Youre so obsessed with other peoples motives and what you dont know. LOL. You trot it around like it some truth only you have clued into. Oh yea. The clue games. Well tricks are for kids, kiara and nobody will play with a cheater for long. Why dont you go make yourself useful on the EO with all your knowledge and bizness savvy instead of telling us you know how to run a military? Stupid psychopath.
posted on January 27, 2006 08:33:53 AMinstead of telling us how to run OUR military...
notice she makes NO comment on the article I posted about WHY Canada HAS TO BE willing to try working things out when it comes to terrorists actions. [Their own military has rusted away from total neglect.]
BTW, I have never denied saying the 'cram it up your azz' comment to lindak when she continually insulted me a few years ago.
She's off base with just how recently she's made those statements to me....NOT a "few years ago"....but in 2005. But as with most things....her mind can't remember what actually took place and when. So...it's easier to falsely state "a few years ago". LOL LOL LOL
She only makes a fool of herself as she continues on with her whining posts. Anyone can see that except her it appears.
--------------------
Just mention her name and while she's just SOOOOOOOOOooooooo busy she's always right here....immediately. LOL BUT she'd like us to believe differently....it's her game. Doesn't fool anyone other than herself....but she keeps insisting it's true. Like a bell goes off when her name is mentioned....she's right here.
and boy when one gets made out for the fool they are the other mysteriously appears for "support".
Thus the given name of 'tag-along' or 'helen's mini-me'. LOL Always needs that backup/support....as she can't stand alone except when she's insulting someone whose caught on to her 'little games'.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
posted on January 27, 2006 08:44:52 AM
Oh helen's feeling so left out....now she has to join KD and kiara with more garbage.
--------------------
Is there a connection between increasingly strident, appeasement-laden rhetoric and the loss of military capability? I think the answer is "yes."
And I agree.....and see this as JUST the position the liberals who post here would like to see the US in. They often say they want the troops removed from harms way....like maybe being trained to protect our Nation...but then use those skills to make baskets or something taught in their liberal colleges - not fight in wars with our enemies. LOL
Won't ever happen under a Republican President....this one or any other. But under a democratic president....they'd much rather have our military funding decreased and used for social programs....so THEN we can be in Canada's position....needing another country to defend our Nation. Nope....no way that's EVER going to happen under a PRO-American president.
While the democratic party complains about everything THIS President does to protect our Nation:
What would a Democrat president have done at that point? Apparently, the answer is: Sit back and wait for the next terrorist attack.
Ann Coulter
Suppose you'd let me place the blame for all the vile, vulgar things said by liberals like mingotree/logansdad/etc. here also....yeah...I'm just SURE you would accept that as YOUR responsibility as they share a lot of your views. LOL