posted on September 2, 2002 05:34:38 PM new
ljart53,
i am glad you still have a job as a school teacher,who is going to read your cut and paste stuff,what are you selling,kid homework??
club1man told the whole world about his case against paypal,he told us he had 71 chargebacks.
posted on September 2, 2002 06:08:31 PM new
Gee club1man, I had more fun and laughs reading your last post then I did at the California State Fair! Tee Hee
posted on September 2, 2002 07:35:08 PM new
You can always tell when the bashers have lost the debate. They turn entirely to personal attacks and insults.
posted on September 2, 2002 07:36:49 PM new
COONR you really must review your work! Where's that monkey? We need him again!
[ edited by ljart53 on Sep 2, 2002 07:41 PM ]
posted on September 2, 2002 08:30:30 PM new
COONR address the facts.
Coonr, Get your facts straight. The"arbitrator" ruled that I was covered under the seller protection plan. He was mistaken when he awarded me 5000 dollars, because the chargebacks happened in 2 different calander years.[see TOS for Oct.2000]. Also it was PAYPONZI'S limits that prevented me from getting it all back. If the "impartial arbitrator" had awarded me 10,000 dollars it would have meant that PAYPONZI would have lost the majority. Meaning that they had spent $338,000.00 in legal fees to get back $3,000.00. By the way those legal fees were as of Feb.2002. The "impartial arbitrator" still for some reason has failed to make a final decission. Over 7 months and PAYPONZI'S lawyers are still billing them. Last I saw was $1,100.00 an hour, but now maybe they have cut down from 3 lawyers and 2 paralegals.
The "impartial arbitrator" as of 4 months ago can't figure out if he can award PAYPONZI legal fees. I thought an arbitrator was supposed to know what he was doing. Anyway PAYPONZI has spent somewhere near a half a million dollars trying to get $13,000 out of me. And all I wanted before this got started was my money back.
Tell me why and stop acting like a
[ edited by club1man on Sep 2, 2002 08:31 PM ]
[ edited by club1man on Sep 2, 2002 08:33 PM ]
posted on September 3, 2002 05:57:03 AM newAlso it was PAYPONZI'S limits that prevented me from getting it all back. If the "impartial arbitrator" had awarded me 10,000 dollars it would have meant that PAYPONZI would have lost the majority.
I stopped because your saying nothing. PayPal rules and limits prevented me from getting a Million Dollars also. If an "impartial arbitrator" had awarded me 10,000 dollars it would have meant that I had a really luck day.
posted on September 3, 2002 01:34:25 PM new
Damon,
The day after you emailed me that our money was returned I announced that publicly in a post. Thank you again.
I am just one customer and the fact that I received my money back does not explain the thousands of complaints against PayPal. I have yet to find a post where you did not conduct yourself in a business like manner.
You must know that the people like COONR, STOPWHINING AND UARU, on all the post, on all the auction sites, does nothing more then infuriate a customer with a problem. The fact that you have never ask them to please not interfer with your ability to solve customer complaints, leads myself and others to believe they are associated with PayPal.
[ edited by ljart53 on Sep 3, 2002 01:36 PM ]
[ edited by ljart53 on Sep 3, 2002 11:12 PM ]
