jamesoblivion
|
posted on June 6, 2001 01:32:01 AM new
Crafty.
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 01:32:59 AM new
That's not it. You never get it anymore.
|
stockticker
|
posted on June 6, 2001 07:48:52 AM new
http://www.auctionwatch.com/mesg/read.html?num=28&thread=75691&id=93890
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on June 6, 2001 07:49:49 AM new
I should have said "or" and not "and".
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:15:31 AM new
No, neither. I saw jlpiece come in in the middle of the night obviously having been stewing and posting responses in each of those threads as though he'd been held back from doing so for a long, long time.
So I frustrated him.
|
NearTheSea
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:29:20 AM new
ah ha I was wondering why every one was locked.
So you did want the last (and some, only)word in ...cute!
[email protected]
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:31:29 AM new
I doubted "and frustrates jlpiece" would fit in the title, so I went without it.
|
mybiddness
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:32:49 AM new
So I frustrated him.
That just doesn't sound like something you would do...
Not paranoid anywhere else but here!
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:50:10 AM new
Actually, jlpiece's return should be regarded as encouraging.
Before he was suspended on May 21st, jlpiece received something like five warnings (not counting nudges) -- including two final warnings -- in the space of about 35 days.
Now he's back after a mere two weeks of suspension. And already trying to get under certain members' skin.
Imagine how heartwarming this is to posters such as KatyD and myself, who were both suspended for 30 days earlier this year without the benefit of even half the warnings jlpiece received -- let alone two final warnings.
It certainly sends a message that we can be disruptive and disrespectful now without fear of lengthy reprisal, and that upon our return we can resume whatever mischief got us suspended in the first place.
It's very uplifting!
P.S. Glad to see the level of consistency at AW remains ... well, consistent.
|
Hjw
|
posted on June 6, 2001 08:59:06 AM new
"And already trying to get under certain members' skin."
Thin skin is not an asset here.
Helen
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 09:29:11 AM new
Spazmodeus, your crimes were perhaps more Spaz-odious?
(I couldn't help it)
|
gravid
|
posted on June 6, 2001 09:40:52 AM new
If everyone locks down their threads before anyone can disagree with them it is going to be pretty short and boring around here.
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 09:45:27 AM new
Get real, those threads were open quite a while, open to disagreement, or is it discussion. Were you out sick or something?
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 09:55:34 AM new
More odious? No. More noble, perhaps, as both Katy and I were suspended because we stood up for our principles, rather than the "crime" of just being a general nuisance.
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 09:58:49 AM new
just the rhyme, that's all.
|
gravid
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:03:18 AM new
My aluminum foil hat got frayed and reception went weird for awhile. All those voices.....
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:04:24 AM new
I know, but I figured there would be someone who'd think you were serious.
|
kraftdinner
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:34:16 AM new
Hey!!!! I was just going to respond to "Ebay's in Delaware"........
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:53:01 AM new
You had your chance after the first time I posted that, kraft. 
Come on Spaz. You don't mean to say that you think anyone thinks that I'm ever serious.
And Gravid, son, you're getting more like spaz's biddies every day.
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:56:13 AM new
You don't mean to say that you think anyone thinks that I'm ever serious.
Ooh, a rare insight and a self admission at that!
|
jlpiece
|
posted on June 6, 2001 10:59:23 AM new
I can reopen any of those threads if I so choose, my friend. I simply made points that others should have, but failed to do during my exile.
Locking them only proves my points to be unarguably solid, so I thank you.
Besides without me around you've gotten soft.
|
KatyD
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:06:56 AM new
I can reopen any of those threads if I so choose
You can't "reopen" those threads JL. Only a moderator can. You could open NEW threads addressing the same topics, but it's doubtful anyone other than yourself would post to them.
KatyD
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:08:06 AM new
Inarguably.
|
jamesoblivion
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:09:11 AM new
Locking them only proves my points to be unarguably solid, so I thank you.
It must be very difficult being so very lofty.
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:10:03 AM new
Hi Katy,
Isn't it gratifying to see jlpiece back after only two weeks?
|
krs
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:21:22 AM new
See? He is frustrated. LoL!
|
KatyD
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:39:18 AM new
Has it only been two weeks, Spaz? My, how time flies when you're having a good time.
The frustration quotient must have been full to bursting which would explain the need to post to nearly every thread initiated in the last two weeks.
Our "sentence" was longer Spaz, because we posted in "contempt of Court" which is a worse offense (I think) than being tried for general obnoxiousness. Also, our sentences was handed down by the "Chief Justice" so no "plea bargains". At any rate, while I think my probation is up, I've given up my life of crime, and am attempting to stay on the straight and narrow. There will, however, always be those "habitual offenders"... 
KatyD
|
stockticker
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:44:19 AM new
|
spazmodeus
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:46:22 AM new
That's because you're really Diana.
|
KatyD
|
posted on June 6, 2001 11:52:37 AM new
Shhhh!! 
KatyD
|
