posted on November 3, 2001 08:49:37 PM new
"Federalizing" screeners is no guarantee of thorough security. Careful background checks and extensive training is the only way to approach what is necessary to ensure proper security.
posted on November 4, 2001 08:00:17 AM new
Interesting question. Besides the article, I've read and heard other discussion of this issue, but haven't formed a strong opinion. For the maximum initial effect I think that the public would be more confident with a federal program handling the security. This could help the struggling industry if it results in a significant increase in demand, as well as thwarting any imminent terrorist plans. I doubt that foreign terrorist groups would make a second attempt, but domestic ones, as well as someone from the usual supply of whackos might. The immediacy of the federal program is its chief arguing point to me. Once a system is soundly in place a transition to private contracting remains a viable option.
posted on November 5, 2001 08:30:19 PM new
We need federal employees that make a decent wage, not $5.15 an hour. Today we saw how good these non federal employees are. A man with knifes and stun gun went through security! I dont know why republicans dont want Americans earning a good wage. You contract it out you get cheap help and that = cheap service.
posted on November 6, 2001 02:31:32 PM new
It was announced today that the government wants the Department of Transportation to oversee airport security.
posted on November 6, 2001 07:39:28 PM new
Backround checks and training would be realized if the program was Federalized.
In the alternative, you're entrusting the security to the low bidder, that doesn't do backround checks, and doesn't train because it takes away profits.
Ultimately I think the whole security issue will devolve into appearance over substance. Apperances are much cheaper.
posted on November 7, 2001 03:39:44 PM new
I heard for the first time tonight that as many as 80% of airport screeners are not native Americans. There is also a large number of convicted felons as the primary security companies are woefully lacking in their screening of screeners. It is being suggested that the company responsible for the O'Hare incident be fired from the 30+ airports they work at.
