posted on February 14, 2004 04:32:50 AM new
Was just reading this....
9-11 Commission Chair Kean and Vice Chair Hamilton today requested a private meeting with the President to discuss information relevant to the Commission's work. The President has agreed to the request. While the Chair and Vice Chair have suggested the possibility of a public session at a later time, we believe the President can provide all the requested information in the private meeting, and there is no need for any additional testimony.
The thought occured.
Rice testifies in private.
Bush testifies in private.
Cheney does his business in private.
Perhaps they should just not tell us who the president is after the election.
He hardly ever makes a definite public statement anyway.
The secret service would be delighted.
How would it change anything?
Nobody would be upset at who won.
The benefits are obvious.
posted on February 14, 2004 11:39:24 AM new
so will I, gravid. Enjoy....enjoy.
-----------
Did the article you read say IF clinton was also going to meet privately with this group? I've read he also said he would tell his side of the story, but I hadn't read whether he was going to be interviewed publically or privately either.
This is a National Security issue and doesn't surprise me one bit that all would not want to discuss this publically.
posted on February 16, 2004 05:52:08 AM new
They're on........
Seems to be working fo0r keeping them occupied from coming over her and attacking anybody in the US. Why should they go to all the trouble and expense when they have thousands to attack right in their own back yard?
