Reamond
|
posted on March 10, 2004 10:29:17 AM new
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37501
|
bunnicula
|
posted on March 10, 2004 11:58:22 AM new
Do as we say,not as we do
******
Censorship, like charity, should begin at home; but unlike charity, it should end there --Clare Booth Luce
|
Twelvepole
|
posted on March 10, 2004 12:02:08 PM new
just anothe example of how the left is blinded...
Why does their constitution have to be like ours?
AIN'T LIFE GRAND... 
http://www.nogaymarriage.com/
|
gravid
|
posted on March 10, 2004 12:51:16 PM new
If you look at the Iraqis new constitution you will see some of the elements the current administration would like to change in ours.
Notice they didn't feel the need to define marriage? That's because homosexuality doesn't exist in Iraq. Just ask them if you don't believe me.
|
reamond
|
posted on March 10, 2004 03:22:25 PM new
So the people in Iraq don't need a 2nd Amendment to arm and protect themselves and we do ?
Someone is surely blind here.
|
Bear1949
|
posted on March 10, 2004 06:50:23 PM new
So once democracy is restored & and terrorism is no longer a problem they can ammend their constitution.
The Democrats ran on 'Honesty' and I told 'em at the time they would never get anywhere. It was too radical for politics. The Republicans ran on 'Common Sense' and the returns showed that there were 8 million more people in the United States who had 'Common Sense' enough not to believe that there was 'Honesty' in politics." --Will Rogers
|
Bear1949
|
posted on March 10, 2004 06:51:59 PM new
Dang slow dial up connection,
[ edited by Bear1949 on Mar 10, 2004 07:03 PM ]
|
Bear1949
|
posted on March 10, 2004 06:53:21 PM new
[ edited by Bear1949 on Mar 10, 2004 07:04 PM ]
|
Bear1949
|
posted on March 10, 2004 07:01:16 PM new
[ edited by Bear1949 on Mar 10, 2004 07:05 PM ]
|
profe51
|
posted on March 10, 2004 07:24:32 PM new
It's not your dialup bear, I'm having trouble posting tonight too, and it's only on Vendido, nowhere else...
doesn't matter if they have a 2nd amendment or not...every Iraqi big enough to shoot already has guns. Just ask a returning GI if you don't believe it.
___________________________________
|
reamond
|
posted on March 10, 2004 07:33:12 PM new
I think the NRA logic works thus for Iraq-- Since there is no 2nd Amendment only criminals and terrorists can have guns in Iraq. Or could it be that our government is disarming the Iraqis so they can't repel their foreign invaders ?
|
replaymedia
|
posted on March 10, 2004 09:30:11 PM new
BY DEFINITION the 2nd Amendment wasn't in our Constitution either. That's why they call it an AMENDMENT. It was added on later.
The Iraqis have plenty of time to add what they need later. It's more important that they get SOMETHING into place than it is to get it 100% right off the bat.
-------------------
We do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing -- Anonymous
There is no 'T' in Chess
Games of All Kinds - Replaymedia.com
|
Twelvepole
|
posted on March 11, 2004 02:50:58 AM new
When was that amendment added to our constitution?
However that being the case, you would be in here b*tching, if it were the same, just more rehtoric about how we are making Iraq like us...
Your diatribes are becoming quite amusing.... almost skylitish...
AIN'T LIFE GRAND...
http://www.nogaymarriage.com/
|
Reamond
|
posted on March 11, 2004 09:11:33 AM new
The Bill of Rights was not an Amendment in the Constitutional sense, it was incorporated into the pro forma document in order to get the Constitution ratified. In order for Iraq's situation to be the same, it would need a Bill of Rights in the pro forma document BEFORE the recent signing/ratification.
Far from being an actual amendment, the Bill of Rights was in the original document -- the delegates would not have ratified the constitution without the Bill of Rights.
As usual, you don't know what you're talking about.
However that being the case, you would be in here b*tching, if it were the same, just more rehtoric about how we are making Iraq like us...
That's the whole point 12-- "we" shouldn't be doing any "making" or unmaking in Iraq. The Iraq people should have chose their own delegates and made their own constitution.
We have inserted and propped up people like Chalabi in Iraq -- Chalabi was the liar who said Iraq had all the WOMDs. We paid him millions for his "intellegence", and now he struts around Iraq like he owns the place-- which he does because we have handed it to him.
|
logansdad
|
posted on March 11, 2004 10:49:36 AM new
In 30 years we will be at war again with Iraq so what difference does it make.
In the 70's we were friendly with Iraq and Saddam, supplying them with weapons to help defeat Iran.
Now we are helping them to rebuild, setup a democracy style governement. They will listen to the US just to get us out of their country. They will be a peaceful country for 10 years and then some body will be elected to office in Iraq and the hatred toward the US will start all over again.
We should have just bombed the country and left. Let them clean up their own mess.
Marriage is a Human Right not a Heterosexual Privledge.
Bigotry and hate will not be tolerated.
Impeach Bush
|
