posted on June 3, 2004 04:14:28 PM new
The WMD were there or are still there. They are either hidden very well or they left the country(probably to Syria).
If Bush was lying about the WMD, don't you think he would have continued the lie and "MADE SURE" some were found. The fact that none have been found(actually some have been) shows that Bush is/was not lying.
posted on June 3, 2004 04:30:37 PM new
No, he did not lie....I agree. But they don't want to hold saddam responsible for NOT proving to the UN, in the 12 year period of time, that he didn't have them either.
No....Osama BinLaden attacked us because we weren't being sensitive enough to his way of doing things....and saddams not to blame either. It's all OUR fault....everything.
Once you understand and accept those two positions you'll be fine.
posted on June 3, 2004 04:54:58 PM new
I agree. I don't believe Bush lied. I firmly believe Saddam has had (and used) them in the past and I believe they were moved to another (sympathetic) country.
My two cents. (Which is about all I have after paying my taxes!)
