posted on September 2, 2002 03:25:45 PM new
KatyD has given me a rough time on occasion and probably with good reason but I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that she never made the statement about the Islams and Muslims that you attribute to her. Frankly, Borillar, you frighten me. Anyone who would make such a blatantly false statement is a dangerously loose cannon.
Helen....the Osama bin Laden like Terrorist (remember that name that you pinned on me only because I said your attitude was arrogant?
You may not remember it but I'll never forget.
Then you also questioned my tolerance. If anything, I am too tolerant. If you mean by intolerance that I don't lap up your idiotic political Horse S$it then you are right about that.
posted on September 2, 2002 04:58:10 PM new
How intersting of you Helen and KadyD, not to remember your own thread where we were discussing the innocents being bombed in Afghanistan and KadyD says:
posted on July 17, 2002 04:24:38 PM by KatyD "Seriously though, Helen, you will have to back up your numbers with a little more credible news source than THAT link. And even if that number was any where near factual (which it isn't) how many of those killed were Taliban, Al-Queda, or even hapless tribespeople whose tribal leaders chose to shelter these Islamic terrorists. Who cares? I don't. I honestly don't. KatyD"
posted on July 17, 2002 06:48:13 PM "There is a reason WHY these Arab countries are living in the dark ages, poverty stricken in third world conditions, and left behind by the rest of the industrialized (and civilized) world. That reason is because they insist on being governed by their Islamic religion. The way they "teach" Islam promotes hate, backwardness, discrimination, and lack of modern inventiveness."
"They are innocent of nothing. And we have no responsiblity for them other than to show them how to govern themselves successfully democratically. Frankly, I have my doubts because I don't believe there is any such thing as "secular" Islam and they as are the other Arab countries that insist on this form of government are doomed."
These remarks are from just one thread. Look at other threads concerning the Israeli - Palestinian situation and you'll find her slamming Islam and Palestinians and Arabs and whatnot unceasingly. It sure looks like a lot of hate speech to me!
posted on September 2, 2002 05:48:27 PM new
You are a stupid fool, Borillar. I stand by those statements and not one of them targeted Muslims or Afghanis because they practiced Islam. The context of the discussion was US military action against the religious extremists who were/are in control of a foreign government that aided and abetted the murders of 9/11. Nowhere in any of those threads or in any other, have I made demeaning comments about Islamic religious practices, rituals, or beliefs. Nowhere have I ever accused Muslims (or any other religion) of "cannabalism" "baby eating" or made any other hateful and inflammatory toward a religious belief. NOWHERE in any thread have I advocated killing ANY human being because of their religious beliefs. And if you think there is ONE secular Islamic government in the world, please enlighten us all, because "secular" and "Islamic" do not co-exist in ANY world government. That is a far stretch from hate speech. I hate terrorists of any ilk, Borillar, and you rank right up there. You have taken over this forum with your paranoic ravings advocating everything from armed rebellion to complete overthrow of our government. You are entitled to your political beliefs, they give me a good chuckle every so often, but your hate speech and ignorant pronouncements about Catholicism and other forms of Christianity are hateful and reflective of what a complete ignoramus you are. There's a reason nearly everyone has fled the RT and YOU are 99.9% of that reason. Your constant pontificating about religious and political matters have driven most of the long-time posters away. So post away a$$hole. Every mis-spelled word you type just reinforces your redneck bigotry that you try to hide behind your "politcially liberal" sham facade.
