posted on October 22, 2004 08:42:59 PM new
Kiara, wouldn't you agree that someone who has to constantly PROVE everything including her happiness by posting lots of LOLs and smiley faces is really quite pathetically sad.
posted on October 22, 2004 08:44:50 PM new
profe - In case you return I'd like to show you, and others, an example of the games kiara plays.
You said to me [profe]
What part of calling somebody a "dumas", an idiot, or suggesting that they have their head up their ass do you consider humorous?
Now...consider why you'd even ask me that question. I believe it's because kiara implied it in her post. So you took it to be true...for that reason only. And since I can't go around constantly correcting all the false statements she continues to make about me, nor all those that crowfarm makes, I don't respond...or I respond in a general way.
Then it appears to me the end result of that is that whatever they say is taken as gospel [fact]...when in fact they've stated lies or implied things I've never said.
Since neither kiara, crowfarm nor anyone else speaks for me, I'd really appreciate their conclusions be discounted when evaluating my own words or actions. It's a sick game they entertain themselves with....and it's quiet childish, imo.
posted on October 22, 2004 08:55:12 PM new
oh I dont know about that profe, I think Jesus probably told quite a few they had their head up their asses in his day........
You know, parklane made a joke. a stupid joke albeit -- but you guys act like its the end of the world because he did. It becomes the bitc*beatup fest...and he's not supposed to sling it back because he has a biblical quote? Profe, they all get exactly what they want from it here: squibbling and squabbling, clucking about all day, getting their creaky hormones fired-up. I'd love to see Linda stop posting for a bit. 10-1 they'd turn on each other. hahaha!!!
posted on October 22, 2004 09:03:22 PM new
neroter - You're right...and it did happen once. One by one the reps were getting fed up and leaving. And I left too for about 4 months. They were constantly complaining about 'where are all the Bush supporters'. They had no one to pick on, argue with and just what you suggested might happen...did.
-----------------------
And I agree...what's okay for some to do....is not allowed by those who won't follow in their same mindset.
They're just using him this time....but it's always someone they'll gang up on. Like they're just SO outraged.
posted on October 22, 2004 09:04:23 PM new
Name calling is name calling, no matter who does it. That being said, there is irony in trying to pass oneself off as a Christian while posting trash talk antithetical to the supposed Christian value system.
____________________
"Bad temper is its own scourge. Few things are more bitter than to feel bitter. A man's venom poisons himself more than his victim." --Charles Buxton
posted on October 22, 2004 09:07:21 PM new
Yes, bunni, kind of like when the atheists and secularists go around here quoting Bible verses to tell us what we're doing wrong.
posted on October 22, 2004 09:12:27 PM new
Ok here now, i'll take some of the heat off of Parklane by posting a lame and in poor taste joke of my own. Someone said that he had asked for a naked picture of Crowfarm at some time in the past, so here you go, here it is.
Scroll down.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ok, ok, so she's not quite naked, but this is still a picture of the dried up old Crowfarm.
posted on October 22, 2004 09:16:57 PM new
Oh Yellow, I hope you didn't hurt your hand on the outside wall of my house as you peeped in my window, pumping furiously with Rosie Palm.
posted on October 22, 2004 09:21:28 PM new
Come on Nero. The self described religious people are the worst ones here for being unkind and judgemental. Parklane is just one of the many that come here, judge everyone, call us all names, then leave in a huff. It happens all the time. What an angry bunch!
posted on October 22, 2004 09:24:07 PM new
Ya, Kraft, wouldn't ya think the "good christians" in here would want to set a good example(as they're instructed to do) for us heathens?
posted on October 22, 2004 09:33:59 PM new
Yellow, I was joking about the dime....I never charged,,,,just did it as often, and with as many men, as possible!
posted on October 22, 2004 11:34:22 PM new
Yawn......Here's an exclamation point for you Profe. It's a comment about the lame plugandsocket challenged liberal whiners. It just happens to be from the bible. But go ahead and make an issue of it, since you are to lame to get it.
__________
Heb 13:8
Jesus Christ! the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
posted on October 23, 2004 05:10:25 AM new It's a comment about the lame plugandsocket challenged liberal whiners. It just happens to be from the bible..
Thanks for explaining! I stand corrected...didn't realize you we using Christ's name in vain. That's different, no hypocrisy there, nosir....
____________________________________________
Dick Cheney: "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11..."
posted on October 23, 2004 08:07:58 AM new "Yes, bunni, kind of like when the atheists and secularists go around here quoting Bible verses to tell us what we're doing wrong."
Linda, I can quote wisdom from the Bible or any other book in the history of World literature to illustrate a point.
Your primative or childish black and white thinking is confusing your brain again.
posted on October 23, 2004 08:22:27 AM new
I'm still wondering how Linda_k can continue to blame me. I looked over this thread and the other topics and I was never the one to start talking about sexual acts or body excrement, nor did I ever encourage it. I did notice that we were chastised by her for not having a sense of humor when we didn't approve of those comments though.
posted on October 23, 2004 08:30:13 AM new
And, Linda... I should add that your reply to Bunni is not logically relevant to her comment. Your technique is to agree then disagree or as in the case above, agree then SPIN.
posted on October 25, 2004 11:56:36 AM new
Linda: Let's be real clear here...UNTIL such time that you purchase Vendio....I'll post however I wish, wherever I wish and laugh at what I find funny. YOU can do whatever YOU wish to do. But you won't be instructing me on what you think I should do. And some nerve you have....you call him pricklane....pricklame...etc. And then you get upset with how HE talks? Now that's funny. kiara - You and helen both have this need to constantly tell others what they should do or shouldn't do. You're both just SO controlling.
As I said in an earlier post Linda doesn't mind all slander, name calling and use of sterotypes unless it is directed at her. Then she wants every one else to come to her rescue.
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on October 25, 2004 12:19:39 PM new
Yes, logansdad. She always flames me first for posting facts and truth and then flames me again because I won't laugh like she does about body orifices and waste.
Strange.....
And I left too for about 4 months. They were constantly complaining about 'where are all the Bush supporters'.
If she truly left, how does she know they were constantly complaining?
posted on October 25, 2004 02:18:51 PM new
Speak Softly But
Use Scary Words and Pictures
Using a soft-spoken female announcer to deliver the harsh message, the ad shows blurry images of a dark forest and a pack of hungry-looking wolves eying the camera and apparently contemplating an attack.
The announcer says that “after the first terrorist attack on America ” Kerry “voted to slash America ’s intelligence operations.” The ad is misleading in several ways, some of which we went over last March when President Bush first accused Kerry of trying to “gut” the intelligence budget.
Here are the ways this ad misleads voters:
•Old news: The “first terrorist attack” the ad refers to didn't happen September 11, 2001, as some listeners assume. It actually was more than a decade ago, in 1993, when a truck bomb went off in the parking garage under one of the World Trade Center towers. In fact, Kerry was supporting regular increases in intelligence spending for several years prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001.
•Exaggerated Wording: Kerry never proposed a single $6-billion cut in intelligence spending. He did propose S.1826 (see "supporting documents" at right) which included a $1-billion cut in 1994. That measure also would have frozen intelligence spending at that reduced level through 1998, allowing it to rise only by the rate of inflation. That could fairly be called a $5-billion cut spread over five years.
Total intelligence spending is a classified figure, but was estimated at the time to be $27 billion per year. So, the cut Kerry proposed amounted to an estimated 3.7 percent -- hardly a proposal to "slash" expenditures. That measure was debated on the Senate floor and on Feb 10,1994 it was defeated 75-20 with 38 Democratic Senators voting against it.
The following year Kerry introduced another deficit-reduction package, S.1290 (see "supporting documents" at right). This one would have lowered the ceiling for intelligence spending by $300 million for five years starting in 1996. That would have amounted to a reduction of just over 1 percent of estimated intelligence spending.
Not only was this proposed reduction a small one, it came at a time when it had just become known that one intelligence agency had been hoarding $1 billion in unspent funds from its secret appropriations. Kerry's proposal died without a hearing, but a similar Republican-sponsored measure eventually became law (see below).
Saying that either of these proposals would “slash” spending is an exaggeration. Saying that a 4 percent or 1 percent cut would have “weakened America ’s defenses” is an opinion which the Bush campaign has a perfect right to state, but it is not a fact.
•Missing Context: The ad doesn’t tell the whole story. Some Republicans also supported similar cuts in intelligence spending at the time, including Bush’s current CIA Director Porter Goss.
Goss co-sponsored a draconian, deficit-elimination bill in 1995 (see "supporting documents" at right) that would have cut the number of CIA employees by 20 percent or more over five years. Goss wasn't the main author -- he signed onto an 1,188-page bill authored by Gerald Solomon, the chairman of the House Rules Committee, of which Goss was a member. The measure died without a hearing and had no prospect of passage, as it called for elimination of the Departments of Education, Energy and Commerce among other things. When questioned about his co-sponsorship of the bill during his confirmation hearings in September Goss said only, "the record speaks for the record."
Another Republican-sponsored cut similar to Kerry's proposed 1995 measure actually became law. On the same day Kerry proposed his $1.5-billion cut spread over five years, the Senate passed by voice vote an amendment to eliminate $1 billion in intelligence funds for fiscal year 1996. That measure was proposed by Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, and a companion measure was co-sponsored by Kerry and Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama. The cut eventually became law as part of a House-Senate package endorsed by the Republican leadership. Specter explained at the time that the $1-billion cut was intended to recapture funds that had been appropriated for spy satellites, but which had gone unspent by the National Reconnaissance Office
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on October 25, 2004 02:43:42 PM new
kiara posts a quote from linduh, , ""And I left too for about 4 months. They were constantly complaining about 'where are all the Bush supporters'. ""
And Kiara says,
"If she truly left, how does she know they were constantly complaining? "
I think Kiara just caught linda in a big
LIE!
What a liar! Nothing but lie after lie...can this woman not ever type the truth?
posted on October 26, 2004 05:55:17 AM new
Who cares about wolves?? I say wolves should all be shot and done away with anyway. You people that love them so much, why don't you live with them then? God, you people are sick.
posted on October 26, 2004 09:12:35 AM new
getalife - Those false accusation on cf's list HAVE been answered repeatedly...since she's too xxxxx to get it, there's no point in answering again.
----------------
Then, cf, has been proven to be a liar....she continually posts statements that he/she implies I've said when I haven't. She's the QUEEN of liars.
---------------------
Because kiara and cf are too dense to be able to understand how I could 'leave' for four months ...not posting...and still know what was said....a third grader could figure that one out. But no...I'm accused of lying.
------------------
I'm beginning to think that in order to not feel the need to respond to the continuing lies kiara and cf make about me I'm going to need to start using some sort of disclaimer when they do make false statements about my actions.
something along the line of:
Now...consider why you'd even ask me that question. I believe it's because kiara implied it in her post. So you took it to be true...for that reason only. And since I can't go around constantly correcting all the false statements she continues to make about me, nor all those that crowfarm makes, I don't respond...or I respond in a general way.
Then it appears to me the end result of that is that whatever they say is taken as gospel [fact]...when in fact they've stated lies or implied things I've never said.
Since neither kiara, crowfarm nor anyone else speaks for me, I'd really appreciate their conclusions be discounted when evaluating my own words or actions. It's a sick game they entertain themselves with....and it's quite childish, imo.
They had no one to pick on, argue with and just what you suggested might happen...did. 