posted on November 3, 2004 05:54:51 PM new
Good to hear the smart people of Wisconsin did not care Kerry called the stadium "Lambert Field".
The Cheeseheads are OK in my book.
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on November 3, 2004 06:08:27 PM new
nerotic says, "I, for one, cant help but notice how gracious the repubs posters on this board have been today"
Your idea of gracious shows your very low class upbringing....you really think the posts by kimlittle, twelve and stonecold are gracious? ??????????????
AND TO KOTO, or anyone else who says don't talk about posters children when I mention linda's alleged son.....well, as linda wants "proof" for evey statement posted, then let her present "proof" that she actually has a son. Until then it may easily be a figment of her rather tiny brain.
posted on November 3, 2004 06:11:54 PM new
OK then Miss Cleo, Jr. (neroter), burbles out of her crystal ball"""You're the one who would be so all in your face had Kerry won, you'd probably be repeating it in six threads or something. You're not right cf. You act like you care about people, and issues so deeply, but you see through skewered eyes. ""
Who the f--- do you think you are .....linda? She's the one who can read our minds around here with all her mighty "powers"....not you, wienie!
"
posted on November 3, 2004 06:20:13 PM new
Hey linda you phony piece of garp.....let us know when god personally answers those rather stupid prayers of your personally...like he speaks to georgie.
"thy will be done"... oh for pete's sakes.... I can just imagine what Mother Linda would be telling god if Kerry won
Although yours is better, Crowfarm, that is a credential that I cherish. And, just between you and me, I have a few others that linda doesn't know about.
posted on November 3, 2004 07:22:09 PM new
Bush has only two more years until he begins to waddle like waterfowl. We've been calling each other names here longer than that. No worries.
____________________________________________
Dick Cheney: "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11..."
posted on November 3, 2004 10:16:09 PM new
I am going to have to side with the Democrats on this one by saying that for the OP, or anyone for that matter, to gloat is out of line and childish. To me it seems that gloating would be to no advantage and nothing can be gained by it. You can bet that GWB won't gloat over his win for the same reasons and because that's not the way to unite the country, to the contrary it would only further divide us.
By the same token it would be wrong for the Democrats to cry over their loss. Would it not be better to just accept it and hope for the best?? Allright, pine over it for a couple of weeks maybe but after that then just MoveOn.org with you're lives and get over it.
posted on November 3, 2004 10:22:28 PM new
I didn't pray last night; I reminded myself that "nobody has died." I do that when dreadful things happen and I know that no one I care about has died so I can get the awful thing in proportion.
My husband ordered a bumper sticker for me today: My God can beat up your God.
And I agree there will be some sort of revolution. Maybe when those young "voters" who didn't vote get drafted.
posted on November 4, 2004 04:02:28 AM new
crowfarm, I have more class in my little pinky than you could amass in three lifetimes trying to match me.
The only one who said anything off bounds was kimlittle and although Kerry did not deserve it - YOU sure did. Stonecold has been calling kerry a loser from the start - why should his opinion be different now?
Your posts, however, are filled with nothing but nasty rabid spittle day in and day out. They're not even humorous. You're just like a globby glump of mucous spittuning any which way all over these boards with your anger and hatred. It changes nothing and gets you nowhere.
Heres a once popular song that is still relevent to you:
You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it's evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don't you know that you can count me out
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell ya is brother you have to wait
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right
You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
posted on November 4, 2004 04:25:40 AM new
No, Cheryl, Bush has said he wants to be the president for all the people of this country. He his at least willing to work towards implementing some assistance to those in need. You and crowfarm, though, You all talk about being divided...but you CHOOSE to stand there and BEGRUDGE so much - you cant work out any differences because you really dont want to.
posted on November 4, 2004 04:42:15 AM new
neroter
He will never be my president or the president of anyone I care about. I have a real problem with people who try to push their "values" onto me. I have a real problem with people who say they care about the American people, but leave millions of poor in the dust. I have a real problem with religion running this country. I sure would love to dig deep into the pasts of those religious rights who voted for Bush.
The ultimate goal of politics is power. The ultimate goal of power is world domination. We had one foot on the path already. You just helped to plant the other foot.
I found out an interesting little tidbit this morning. My brother didn't vote for Bush because he likes him or even approves of the job he's doing. As a matter of fact, he's not real fond of him as I've found out. He voted for him because his church told him and the congregation to vote that way. Imagine that. The Mormons touting their "values" and the congregation blindly following orders. Doesn't sound Hitler-like to me. No sireee.
posted on November 4, 2004 05:10:30 AM new
Nw Cheryl were is your we need to come together... here you are judging your brother's church, say you hate President Bush... do you think those of us that hated kerry would of goose stepped to his song? No sirreee...
Once again who gives a crap what some london enquirer rag has to say... over 50% of America chose, yes chose President Bush...
too bad you libs can't see what a bad choice you offered up...
AIN'T LIFE GRAND...
Bigotry and prejudice -- these are assertions, not arguments. This is name-calling, not case-building.
posted on November 4, 2004 06:12:03 AM new
Linda: I'm a Bush supporting woman....here me roar.
You are woman, mop my floor. !!!!!
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
posted on November 4, 2004 06:22:15 AM new
neroter says," Stonecold has been calling kerry a loser from the start - why should his opinion be different now? "
Well, to neroter and all the other neocons I say the same to YOU!
I've called bush a loser from the start , why should my opinion change now? Did he change? NO! He is steadfast on the wrong course.
Your total lack of reasoning ability can't handle the fact that I have no reason to change my opinion just because he won again.
I doubt very much that if Kerry had won, the neonazicons on this board like linda, bear, and twelve would "get behind" Kerry and support him. And why would they? They don't don't agree with his policies, why would they stand behind him.
See, neroter , we are not ALL sheep.
And, it's nice to see the Beatles are your classy source of political inspiration. But the song does have that chanting thing the neocons are so good at using to ignore the real issues.
posted on November 4, 2004 06:47:44 AM new
This election is a tragedy unparalleled in American history. The result will lead to four more years of suffering, war, death and destruction here and all over the world. How can anybody in good conscious support that in order to coddle your misguided sense of "values".
posted on November 4, 2004 08:33:26 AM new
Cheryl: We lived in Utah for 21 years, and I can tell you the church (subtly but effectively) does tell its people how to vote. Sometimes flyers are handed out as people are leaving the church, the Sunday before Tuesday elections, often with misinformation or even scurrilous claims. A friend of mine running for state senate was defeated by last-minute flyers that were filled with false claims. I don't have much respect for "God's people" who play those games.
About the London papers: Another front page is all black, with small white letters in the middle that say "Oh, God."
Those of you who want to dismiss foreigners who think we've elected the wrong person need to remember that those countries have cultures that go back more than a thousand years; they have deep thinkers; AND they have an educated populace who can write, spell, punctuate, and think clearly. Not smart to dismiss all those other countries; we need them as allies, don't we?
I haven't read much concern about the gender, age, race or ethnicity of the voters. But I wouldn't discount the number who voted for religious values. Here as elsewhere, some vague and apparently undefinable "values" have been mentioned as a justification for voting for Bush. Although I have asked several times for someone to explain those "values" to me, no one has been able to articulate them.
It's a moot point now, since the religious right and those people who voted religious values were simply manipulated by the Bush administration. Now, the country will be directed by an elite corporate class powered by the faith and ignorance of those believers.
BTW, Since you are focused on the percentages of people voting, it's important to remember that the "mandate" that Bush so proudly talks about represents only 51% of the American people.
posted on November 4, 2004 11:17:31 AM new
The Op does not post much, but this was sure a good way to get all the mean-mouthed bitter liberals to start grousing about the loss by their flawed platform.
That is where to look, the flawed liberal weenie interpretation of the world. People want their civil rights and they want security. People want tradition and family values. They don't want to be told that two old perverts corn-holing each other is the same as marriage.
We don't need a bunch of elitist megalomaniacs telling us what we are doing wrong. We need people in positions of power that get the job done defending America, not turning our future over to the effete snobs in Europe and the United Nations.
Kerry did not lose because he was Kerry, but rather because of the flawed vision of the Democratic party. On the same note, Bush did not win because he is Bush, but because he was the representative of the vision the majority felt was right for America.
I don't understand how you're so confused about religion vs "values."
An example I posted in the other thread:
"The world doesn't revolve around gay and non-gay. The majority don't care. And while the majority don't care, they also don't want to hear a constant harangue about being gay is normal, just "different". So they all vote for a definition of "marriage" in the traditional sense. This converts in the liberal brain as everyone wants to burn gays at the stake."
is an example.
You probably think the "religious right" was the reason for the massive defeats of the gay marriage bills around the country. From the press and tv, the world would think half the population is gay. When parents get textbooks about "Bob & Fred have an alternate life style. If Bob gets a 10% discount on a $5 pack of condoms, how much did he save?", they don't freak out or transfer the kid to private school because they're part of the "religious right".
posted on November 4, 2004 12:38:31 PM new
Desquirel: "The world doesn't revolve around gay and non-gay. The majority don't care. And while the majority don't care, they also don't want to hear a constant harangue about being gay is normal, just "different". So they all vote for a definition of "marriage" in the traditional sense. This converts in the liberal brain as everyone wants to burn gays at the stake."
Your reasoning is wrong. If what you claim is true - that the majority don't care like you have said- then there would be no need to put any type of gay marriage imitative on a ballot. The initiatives were on the ballot because DUMBYA had put a fear into people that the gay population is corrupting "the sanctity of marriage" which is going to lead to downfall of society. It is the fear that drove out the religious right in records numbers.
It is the same sort of fear that the Republicans tried to instill in people about the war. Both Bush and Cheney had said you vote for Kerry, the US will be bombed again. The majority of the Republican campaign was trying to instill this "fear" into people.
There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002
---------------------------------- "Give it up for George W. Bush, the best friend international jihad ever had."
This topic is 6 pages long: 1new2new3new4new5new6new
