posted on February 2, 2003 05:12:33 PM new
The first sign Saadam will see of the U.S. & Brits coming, will be the smoke & fire raining from the smart bombs from the F117's onto these sights.
posted on February 2, 2003 05:41:59 PM new
Yep!
Now the powers that be, can have a real liberating experience, and go in and show them what WOMD of quality can do and use them for the purpose to which they were intended, drop'em on the people of iraq,the whole girth, from hills to shiny sea.(and all others around there next, except Israel of course)
That's got to be good for turnover and profitability.
And with less people alive, it'll mean more for us.
Well see who the brave are when those cowards start dropping them on us.
Then on to Korea, and then China. [Fat Chance]
How is it that we can show such 'bravery' when facing a weaker 'foe'.
posted on February 2, 2003 06:46:33 PM new
Bear
Bravery has nothing to do with being anti-war or USA policy.
Your ranting again and not making sense.
I’ve told you that your knowledge and ability to reason seems confined to the topic of ballistics.
According to ABC radio, Israel is doing trial bombing runs over Iraq, right now and paying witnesses to speak.
They have a GOD given Right to Palastine because God told them so, through his publishers.
And they’ve been singing for it for a couple of thousand years (allegedly).Non Semite Jews, widely support this zionist cause.
Satellite evidence indicates the regime is bluffing hard or really reviving its nuclear program as the White House focuses on Iraq.
WASHINGTON -- Mounting evidence that North Korea is forging ahead with an effort to set up a nuclear assembly line suggests that the regime in Pyongyang may be determined to trigger a crisis on the Korean peninsula just as the Bush administration is most preoccupied with Iraq, analysts warned
Saddam will be long gone of course before the first shot is fired.
And then millions of innocent Iraqi civilians will be killed.
Helen
[ edited by Helenjw on Feb 2, 2003 06:58 PM ]
posted on February 2, 2003 07:46:57 PM newP L E A S E
[I]Your ranting again and not making sense.
I’ve told you that your knowledge and ability to reason seems confined to the topic of ballistics.[/i]
I'm not the narrow minded, "The Sky is Falling" chicken little alarmist you portray yourself to be.
Get a grip, get a life. Your views & opinions really have the opposite effect and have become a great source of ridicule & amusement.
And there you go again persecuting the Israeli's for ALLEGEDLY flying into Iraq. And you really believe ABC Radio. Not that they are one of the most liberal left wing news sources ever. Blame the Israeli's for everything that happens in the mid East, that's your answer for all the worlds woes. The Palestinians have no more right to the land thy occupy, than the Iraqi's did to occupy Kuwait.
Helen,
George has stated that We are ready to use nukes, but only if they are used against us first
I don't have a problem with that.
North Korea has shown no signs (that I have read of) that it has the technology to deliver a nuclear weapon via ICBM.
How much would you be willing to wager that there are a number of U.S. boomers, (U.S. subs equipted with tactical nuclear missles) crusing off the coast of N Korea. If N Korea were to detonate a nuke against nations friendly to U.S. interests, how long do you think it would take to retaliate.
A two front war would not last but a matter of days. The results would produce only one Korea because N Korea would cease to exist.
A classified document signed by President Bush specifically allows for the use of nuclear weapons in response to biological or chemical attacks, apparently changing a decades-old U.S. policy of deliberate ambiguity, it was learned by The Washington Times.
"The United States will continue to make clear that it reserves the right to respond with overwhelming force — including potentially nuclear weapons — to the use of [weapons of mass destruction] against the United States, our forces abroad, and friends and allies," the document, National Security Presidential Directive 17, set out on Sept. 14 last year.
Bear, it appears that you are the one that is on a rant.
And to complicate this potential halocaust, we have Israel and Sharon to control. They are not under US direction and a possible exchange between Iraq and Israel is likely. What a doomsday for so many poor people!!!
posted on February 2, 2003 09:31:09 PM new
> Your views & opinions really have the opposite effect and have become a great source of ridicule & amusement.
Only for the uneducated and uninformed, it appears . . .
posted on February 2, 2003 11:06:49 PM new
Bear1949
"The Sky is Falling" chicken little alarmist you portray yourself to be.
There you go again bear.
“persecuting the Israeli's “
Oh yes bear, they really are the persecuted ones,
unlike the Muslims who see only Love coming from you.
You don’t think it wrong to support hypocrisy of war such as the US lead Military action against the people of Iraq.
But think it wrong to criticise the US war actions or motives, Or other atrocities by Israel.
You are willing to fight over words and flags while risking the lives of humans.
Are you just supporting war so your military men, past and present, don’t feel their sacrifices are behind a cause that was wrong.
Have you ever considered that?
Or is it unpatriotic to not follow blindly?
When I said ‘FAT CHANCE’ I was referring to War with China.
posted on February 3, 2003 05:56:07 AM new
BORLLIAR, THAT IS WHAT MAKES THE USA THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, EVEN PEOPLE LIKE YOU CAN SPEAK YOUR UNEDUCATED AND MISINFORMED INFORMATION...
AUSTBOUNTY WHEN YOU STOP MASTICATING ON THAT FECAL MATTER YOU DEARLY LOVE...GO DOWN TO A LOCAL PUB AND KNOCK BACK A FEW FOSTER'S, YOU DEFINATELY DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT KILLING ANY BRAIN CELLS.
posted on February 3, 2003 01:41:13 PM new
What I am interested in hearing about is how Saddam will take it. Reading that article, you'd think that his "inner circle" could be trustedd by him. Now I wonder if they'll all be shot! Saddam now knows that even his innier circle of protectors can be gotten to.
posted on February 4, 2003 01:57:22 AM newIn any event it should quiet the naysayers. Would be nice, but I'm not as optimistic about that as you appear to be.
_______
And I have no websites, as in Rules of the RT number 5, provision A, that Borillar issued earlier. ROFLMHO.... very good.
but NTS, under the 'rules of the RT' ALL will be required to follow them....even the rule maker. and sometimes that presents a problem
