posted on July 15, 2003 10:24:53 AM new
It is to early for me to draw a conclusion as to his guilt or innocence.
One thing I have drawn from watching from the start of the trial (I hate being unemployed) is once again the police have shown great ineptitude when dealing with celebrity cases.
Either he killed his wife, or the police have set out on a course to discredit a man who has been a thorn in their side.
I do not think they will be able to prove a killing even if it was fowl play. The defense has gotten one officer after another to admit the scene was not secured including letting outside civilians onto the scene.
I think in the end, it will have vast similarities to the OJ trail with the defendant being found not guilty largely based on the ineptitude of the local authorities.
posted on July 15, 2003 10:59:00 AM new
Even though everyone is "innocent until proven guilty," I do suspect he did to it and that the evidence that we aren't aware of will show that he did indeed murder his wife and their unborn child.
If he is found "not guilty" then he will be sued like OJ and his life will be miserable. OJ's life is miserable, but because OJ is OJ, it is better than the common joe's like us and Peterson. I don't think that he will get the "special" treatment as OJ does.
Or if he is found not guilty and not sued, then he will be arrogant and do the same alleged thing, unfortunately for the possible victims and their loved ones.
posted on July 15, 2003 11:09:52 AM new
Scrabblegod,
I would make a good juror on this trial because I haven't formed an opinion. I'll be reading your thread with interest!
I've noticed that news coverage of this crime and other related type crimes has significantly diminished while the current administration's credibility is under consideration. It's good to see fair coverage by mainstream media for a change.
