posted on November 5, 2004 05:46:47 PM new
The jury is in deliberations in the Scott Peterson trial. If you've followed the case, you might have an idea whether, in your opinion, he will be found guilty or not. Do you think the prosecution presented enough to convict?
posted on November 5, 2004 06:49:52 PM new
Everything is so "incriminating". I don't know if the prosecution has anything concrete or if all of the evidence is circumstantial, but in my gut I think he did it. If he did, I pray they find him guilty and put his sorry ass behind bars. If he's prejudiced and homophobic, I hope some extremely large fellow of color makes him his "be-atch". Just my thoughts...
posted on November 5, 2004 07:30:11 PM new
He's innocent and will be let go...
Prosecution proved nothing that is definitive...maybe the relatives can sue for wrongful death.... but that would be wrong to.
AIN'T LIFE GRAND...
Bigotry and prejudice -- these are assertions, not arguments. This is name-calling, not case-building.
[ edited by Twelvepole on Nov 5, 2004 07:30 PM ]
posted on November 5, 2004 07:46:07 PM new
Doesn't matter what I think, the jury will find him innocent, he at least covered his tracks better than OJ...
AIN'T LIFE GRAND...
Bigotry and prejudice -- these are assertions, not arguments. This is name-calling, not case-building.
posted on November 5, 2004 08:40:34 PM new
Prosecution produced insufficent evidence.
Cops (again) made too many errors, didn't investigate all leads, to concentrated on Scott from the begining.
Not saying he didn't do it, just that it wasn't prooved.
Americans again prove Pres Bush is the best man for the job
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The person who has nothing for which he is willing
to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
--John Stuart Mill
