posted on April 12, 2003 06:20:05 PM new
::I said that there is an effort to restore order by locating Saddam's police force. Then, I said, Isn't that a horrific thought?
You wrongly interpreted that statement to indicate that I object to using police for security ::
DId I misinterpret your definition of horrific, or was the assumption that the need for order and the attempted assembly of police in the same sentence meant that they were a connected thought an incorrect one?
What was the statement supposed to mean?
BTW - By all reports I have seen the military that carried out his acts of brutality. I have not seen reports of civilian police being involved.
