Home  >  Community  >  The Vendio Round Table  >  Was Lt. Kerry AWOL from the Ready Reserve?


<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>
 Bear1949
 
posted on July 7, 2004 10:29:36 PM new

On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6-year enlistment contract with the Navy (plus a 6-month extension during wartime).

On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry also signed an Officer Candidate contract for 6 years -- 5 years of ACTIVE duty & ACTIVE Naval Reserves, and 1 year of inactive standby reserves (See items #4 & $5).

Because John Kerry was discharged from TOTAL ACTIVE DUTY of only 3 years and 18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per year, and not more than 17 days active duty for training. Kerry was also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Additionally, Kerry, as a commissioned officer, was prohibited from making adverse statements against his chain of command or statements against his country, especially during time of war. It is also interesting to note that Kerry did not obtain an honorable discharge until Mar. 12, 2001 even though his service obligation should have ended July 1, 1972.

Lt. John Kerry's letter of 21 Nov. 1969 asking for an early release from active US Navy duty falsely states "My current regular period of obligated service would be completed in December of this year."

On Jan. 3, 1970 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve Manpower Center in Bainridge, Maryland.

Where are Kerry's Performance Records for 2 years of obligated Ready Reserve, the 48 drills per year required and his 17 days of active duty per year training while Kerry was in the Ready Reserves? Have these records been released?

Has anyone ever talked to Kerry's Commanding Officer at the Naval Reserve Center where Kerry drilled?

On 1 July 1972 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve - Inactive.
On 16 February 1978 Lt. John Kerry was discharged from US Naval Reserve.

Below are some of the crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready Reservist, while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War:

1. Lt. Kerry attended many rallies where the Vietcong flag was displayed while our flag was desecrated, defiled, and mocked, thereby giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
2. Lt. Kerry was involved in a meeting that voted on assassinating members of the US Senate.
3. Lt. Kerry lied under oath against fellow soldiers before the US Senate about crimes committed in Vietnam.
4. Lt. Kerry professed to being a war criminal on national television, and condemned the military and the USA.
5. Lt. Kerry met with NVA and Vietcong communist leaders in Paris, in direct violation of the UCMJ and the U.S. Constitution.

Lt. Kerry by his own words & actions violated the UCMJ and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Lt. Kerry's 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris is in direct violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry's subsequent support of the communists while leading mass protests against our military in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our Constitution's Article 3, Section 3, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare. (see photo below). The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, states, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

Since Lt. Kerry engaged in insurrection, rebellion and gave aid and comfort to the enemy while a member of the U.S. Armed Forces in violation of his oath, John Kerry should discontinue his campaign for the presidency and resign his seat in the U.S. Senate. Kerry disgraced his citizenship, and dishonored the USA. He is not fit for any public office, much less the highest office in the land.

John Forbes Kerry should also be tried for treason on behalf of the thousands of GIs who were killed and maimed while Kerry was aiding their enemy, and held to account for his part in the slaughter of millions of Asians by communists after the US abandoned SE Asia.


This will teach you to call a Secret Service Agent a SOB..

http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/staticpages/index.php?page=AWOL

http://www.johnkerry.com/about/Enlistment_Contract.pdf
http://www.johnkerry.com/about/Officer_Candidate_Agreement.pdf
http://www.johnkerry.com/about/DD214.pdf
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm
http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:ArticleToMail&Type=text/html&Path=NYS/2004/03/12&ID=Ar00100











"The natural family is a man and woman bound in a lifelong covenant of marriage for the purposes of:
*the continuation of the human species,
*the rearing of children,
*the regulation of sexuality,
*the provision of mutual support and protection,
*the creation of an altruistic domestic economy, and
*the maintenance of bonds between the generations."
 
 crowfarm
 
posted on July 7, 2004 10:33:04 PM new
Ya, poobear, those were FAKE medals he won....he wasn't REALLY in Vietnam..they just made those videos last year in a studio.


Bush hid in a bottle during the war.

Oh, I heard a good one about him..can't remember it all but it was something about his daddy's wealth and Junior being born with a silver coke spoon up his nose!

 
 Bear1949
 
posted on July 7, 2004 10:56:29 PM new
maggie your head is to too deap in your muffins to comprehend a grown up topic like the one I posted.






"The natural family is a man and woman bound in a lifelong covenant of marriage for the purposes of:
*the continuation of the human species,
*the rearing of children,
*the regulation of sexuality,
*the provision of mutual support and protection,
*the creation of an altruistic domestic economy, and
*the maintenance of bonds between the generations."
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on July 7, 2004 11:34:25 PM new
It is also interesting to note that Kerry did not obtain an honorable discharge until Mar. 12, 2001 even though his service obligation should have ended July 1, 1972.


That is VERY unusual....boy would I like more to ask about that.


You know, bear, I just can't imagine someone like kerry being Commander-In-Chief.....even just the thought of it being possible, just scares me to death.....sincerely.







Re-elect President Bush!!


[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 7, 2004 11:36 PM ]
 
 bunnicula
 
posted on July 8, 2004 12:16:31 AM new


Gee, Bear, at least get your story straight--in another thread you yourself display official military records showing that Kerry got an honorable discharge in 1978...
____________________

We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. -- John F. Kennedy
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on July 8, 2004 12:43:45 AM new
If he was discharged in 1978....he was still a military person in 1971...when he gave his speech about the atrocities our troops were committing....that he himself admitting committing....and when he was giving aid and comfort to our enemy.

When he was calling our democracy a farce.


edited to add:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=/SpecialReports/archive/200405/SPE20040503a.html




And while kerry's always telling us how much support he gets from Vietnam vets....there's plenty that see him MUCH differently.

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/



Vietnam POW's Against John Kerry

http://www.vnsfvetakerry.com/LettersPOWS.htm



McCain:

Hanoi Hilton Guards Taunted POWs With Kerry's Testimony



These days, former Vietnam War POW Sen. John McCain has nothing but praise for his fellow Vietnam veteran Sen. John Kerry, the Democrats' current presidential front-runner.



But after he was released from the Hanoi Hilton in 1973, McCain publicly complained that testimony by Kerry and others before J. William Fulbright's Senate Foreign Relations Committee was "the most effective propaganda [my North Vietnamese captors] had to use against us."



"They used Senator Fulbright a great deal," McCain wrote in the May 14, 1973, issue of U.S. News &World Report. 



While he was languishing in a North Vietnamese prison cell, Kerry was telling the Fulbright committee that U.S. soldiers were committing war crimes in Vietnam as a matter...



To read the rest of this article, go to http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/2/17/124410.shtml



Re-elect President Bush!!!

edited several times


[ edited by Linda_K on Jul 8, 2004 01:22 AM ]
 
 crowfarm
 
posted on July 8, 2004 09:28:20 AM new
linda, at least Kerry was active in one way or another....and he's got the medals to prove it.


George was STILL hiding in a bottle.

 
 Helenjw
 
posted on July 8, 2004 10:29:16 AM new

Linda! Twisted Linda! Thats twisted, twisted, twisted!

It should be criminal to post so many twisted lies.

 
 logansdad
 
posted on July 8, 2004 02:03:51 PM new
You know, bear, I just can't imagine someone like kerry being Commander-In-Chief.....even just the thought of it being possible, just scares me to death.....sincerely


At least he served in the military unlike Bush and Cheney. Bush is comander and chief but yet knew nothing of what was going on in the Iraqi prisons. Bush tries to circumvent the US laws by not giving prisoners their rights to a trial.

Bush has poorly planned for the war in Iraq and is now paying for it.


I don't know if any other President could do worse than what Bush has already done.
Let's have a BBQ, Texas style, ROAST BUSH
------------------------------
All Things Just Keep Getting Better
------------------------------


We the people, in order to form a more perfect Union....
.....one Nation indivisible, With Liberty and Justice for ALL.
 
 Bear1949
 
posted on July 8, 2004 03:51:11 PM new
Bush tries to circumvent the US laws by not giving prisoners their rights to a trial.





Since when are terrorists considered prisoners of war.

#1 The terrorists are not aligned to any COUNTRY therefore they are not afforded protection under the Geneva Treaty.

#2 The should be treated as the German's that infiltrated the US in WWII with the intent of planting explosives. That is shot within weeks of their capture.

#3 And since many of the released detainees from Gitmo have been observed back fighting in Iraq & Afghanistan, they too should be executed.





"The natural family is a man and woman bound in a lifelong covenant of marriage for the purposes of:
*the continuation of the human species,
*the rearing of children,
*the regulation of sexuality,
*the provision of mutual support and protection,
*the creation of an altruistic domestic economy, and
*the maintenance of bonds between the generations."
 
 Linda_K
 
posted on July 8, 2004 05:20:38 PM new
Hey bear.....here that?

Now some ignorant dem thinks our military hands out honorable discharges to those who never served.



[logansdad] says: At least he served in the military unlike Bush and Cheney.




Sure is nice to see how the dems support the actions of their country isn't it? [NOT]






Re-elect President Bush!!
 
 logansdad
 
posted on July 9, 2004 06:39:49 AM new
Since when are terrorists considered prisoners of war.

Jose Padilla is an American who has been locked up in prison for the past two years without seeing his laywer......




Let's have a BBQ, Texas style, ROAST BUSH
------------------------------
All Things Just Keep Getting Better
------------------------------


We the people, in order to form a more perfect Union....
.....one Nation indivisible, With Liberty and Justice for ALL.
[ edited by logansdad on Jul 9, 2004 04:40 PM ]
 
 logansdad
 
posted on July 9, 2004 06:43:04 AM new
[logansdad] says: At least he served in the military unlike Bush and Cheney.




Sure is nice to see how the dems support the actions of their country isn't it? [NOT]



Linda, it is nice to know you call every one un-American because they don't support Bush. I know you like to look at polls so have you taken a gander at the most recent polls. The majority of Americans don't support Bush's war in Iraq. They all think it was a big mistake. I guess then over half of the people in this country are un-American.




Let's have a BBQ, Texas style, ROAST BUSH
------------------------------
All Things Just Keep Getting Better
------------------------------


We the people, in order to form a more perfect Union....
.....one Nation indivisible, With Liberty and Justice for ALL.
[ edited by logansdad on Jul 9, 2004 07:59 AM ]
 
 crowfarm
 
posted on July 9, 2004 06:59:43 AM new
Here's the thing that linda refuses to address.


She thinks if she ignores it it'll go away. Another blind righty totally fooled.

linda says,"Cheryl - There's a HUGE difference between protesting and siding with the enemy. A HUGE difference"



linda, there's a huge difference between going to Vietnam and fighting and staying home drunk like bush did.

I think avoiding the war altogether helped the enemy, too.


 
 Bear1949
 
posted on July 9, 2004 12:50:07 PM new
Linda, what can I say. The ignorance of some Dems is only out weighed by their stupidity. But then their stupidity knows no limits.






"The natural family is a man and woman bound in a lifelong covenant of marriage for the purposes of:
*the continuation of the human species,
*the rearing of children,
*the regulation of sexuality,
*the provision of mutual support and protection,
*the creation of an altruistic domestic economy, and
*the maintenance of bonds between the generations."
 
 crowfarm
 
posted on July 10, 2004 04:38:47 PM new
Wasting away in Margaritaville, looking form y lost shaker of salt......

 
 crowfarm
 
posted on July 10, 2004 08:36:09 PM new
Here's the thing that linda refuses to address.


She thinks if she ignores it it'll go away. Another blind righty totally fooled.

linda says,"Cheryl - There's a HUGE difference between protesting and siding with the enemy. A HUGE difference"



linda, there's a huge difference between going to Vietnam and fighting and staying home drunk like bush did.

I think avoiding the war altogether helped the enemy, too

 
 
<< previous topic post new topic post reply next topic >>

Jump to

All content © 1998-2024  Vendio all rights reserved. Vendio Services, Inc.™, Simply Powerful eCommerce, Smart Services for Smart Sellers, Buy Anywhere. Sell Anywhere. Start Here.™ and The Complete Auction Management Solution™ are trademarks of Vendio. Auction slogans and artwork are copyrights © of their respective owners. Vendio accepts no liability for the views or information presented here.

The Vendio free online store builder is easy to use and includes a free shopping cart to help you can get started in minutes!